This is from Bronwyn Hancock on the AVN list in Australia, commenting to
someone else on the list who hasn't read one iota about vaccine dangers.
I thought it was excellent and wanted to share with others and Bronwyn gave
(Vaccination Information Service)
LOGIC dictates that you research a subject before you comment on it.
LOGIC dictates that you don't assume a claim is true when it is supporting
one of the biggest and most powerful industries in the world.
LOGIC dictates that no matter how often a claim is repeated, it does not
make it true, though as Hitler knew, if you repeat it often enough, the
masses will believe it (and ardently so).
When you do some research and discover that vaccines contain some of the
most poisonous compounds and elements known to man (and foreign organic
material that is also toxic when injected into anything),
i.e. formaldehyde, mercury and aluminium compounds, phenol (carbolic acid),
borax (ant killer), methanol, dye, acetone (solvent, polish remover),
disinfectant, glycerine, antifreeze, MSG and several other poisons, plus
also toxic when injected, animal organ tissue and blood (e.g. monkey, cow,
chicken, pig, sheep, dog, etc), contaminant animal viruses (e.g. SV40, which
causes cancer in humans), aborted human foetus cells, large foreign
proteins, mutated (more virulent) human viruses in high doses, bacterial
endotoxins, antibiotics, bacteria, genetically modified yeast, latex, and
animal, bacterial and viral DNA, which, when injected, can be incorporated
into the recipient's DNA,
then LOGIC dictates that you question whether violent poisons, which by
definition are very harmful, are really going to be good for any living
creature's immune system(?), let alone your tiny infant with its very
immature immune and neurological systems.
LOGIC also dictates that man was not created with an immune system designed
not to be able to work until the twentieth century when it only could do so
by man's intervention (particularly when the intervention was to poison
Some people will have enough LOGIC to stop there, but if you want to go
further (or have missed discovering the above) and delve into medical
research, then LOGIC dictates that you study the pro-vaccination articles
properly and not rely on unsupported conclusions of authors paid by vaccine
LOGIC dictates that if a vaccine was introduced AFTER a decline in the
disease, then it was not responsible for that decline.
LOGIC dictates that because outbreaks occur amongst fully vaccinated
populations (often with those not vaccinated not even contracting the
disease), vaccines are not protecting people against disease.
LOGIC dictates that if you have "no previous vaccination" as a guideline in
disease diagnosis, supported with teaching doctors that vaccinated people
just don't get the disease, then you are likely to get low reported figures
of disease cases in vaccinated people, no matter how ineffective, or rather
counterproductive, vaccination actually is.
LOGIC dictates that since the documented effect of vaccines is to
"SENSITISE" the immune system, and "sensitise" means "anaphylaxis", which is
the opposite of "prophylaxis", which means prevention, then vaccines do the
opposite of prevention.
LOGIC dictates that since sensitisation is such a big problem in highly
vaccinated populations (and the problem is confined to these, by the way),
asthma alone killing 800 people in this country every year, then without
doing any more research, one would already be able to guess that vaccines
are quite likely killing a large number of people.
LOGIC dictates that since only the vaccinated can get the new, more
dangerous, atypical forms of diseases (e.g. atypical measles), then
vaccination is not terribly protective!
LOGIC (and indeed medical policy) dictates that if you administer any
vaccine or other procedure to a healthy person and a serious event
immediately occurs, you have to consider that procedure as the cause of the
event, particularly when it is biologically extremely plausible, based on
the contents of what is administered (not to mention the invasive mechanism
of injection, which, unlike normal skin grazes and cuts, bypasses important
defence levels in the body).
LOGIC dictates that since doctors are refusing to report cases of adverse
events, then we cannot rely on government figures telling us how "rare"
these events are supposed to be.
LOGIC dictates that if senior pharmaceutical executives themselves candidly
tell us that "natural enthusiasm" in the marketing department causes the
companies to exaggerate (i.e. lie) when informing (doctors and others) about
threat and occurrence of diseases (BMJ Apr 13, 2002), then it is probably
LOGIC dictates that since whenever doctors go on strike the death rate
drops, you can't really rely on anything they do or tell you about how to
....I could go on.
How much more LOGIC do you need?