2. CRUK have a specific policy of not granting funds for research into "alternative" approaches to the treatment of cancer.
3. CRUK funding, as far as treatment is concerned, is directed towards patentable drugs etc.
4. CRUK are ignoring the views of holistic practitioners and the testimonies of the thousands of patients who have survived by using naturopathic therapies, after being damaged and left for dead by treatments developed by orthodox cancer research.
5. CRUK are actively promoting surgery, drugs and radiation, over 25 years after the leading US cancer statistician stated that this approach killed the patient much faster than the disease did.
6. CRUK policy on cancer causation remains in line with the ICRF statement "One of the biggest myths in recent years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused by exposure to radiation, pollution, pesticides and food additives . these factors have very little to do with the majority of cancers in this country." No genuine cancer research organisation would have gone out of its way to protect these industries.
7. CRUK have no research projects funded which are investigating the main causes of cancer - radiation, pollution, pesticides, food additives ..etc
8. CRUK have a deliberate policy of not investigating any products of the pharmaceutical industry known to damage the immune system, thereby increasing the chances of cancer : vaccines, antibiotics, antipyretics, analgesics, steroids etc.
9. CRUK are well aware that cancer experts such as Prof. Karol
Sikora have stated that a cure for cancer is not possible through
orthodox cancer treatments but are still putting out statements and
advertisements falsely stating that cures for cancer are being achieved
by CRUK-supported treatments. These fraudulent "cures" are being
achieved by misdiagnosis and by 5-year-survival being passed of as
THE FAILURE IS DELIBERATE
"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programmes, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory. Triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuating charities... It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishment by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested. The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs regardless of actual testing results and, preferably, without any testing at all." ----- The Huston/Null Analysis
The charitable status for Cancer Research UK must be withdrawn; they are, clearly, not acting for the interests of the public, the cancer patient or the consumer.