Attacks on revisionist
[back] Holocaust revisionism [back] Assassinations
[If you read the media you will think people like Irving are neo-Nazis, Denialists, and/or anti-Semites, and if you look into the subject you will be one as well. Basic Word Game propaganda. It is telling that only the revisionists have ever conducted forensic examinations of the alleged gas chambers and alleged mass grave sites: The Leuchter Report; the Rudolf Report; Richard Krege Report (ground radar at Treblinka) not forgetting the aerial Ball Report. Truth doesn't need to kill people, maim them, or put them in jail. That is Big Brother.]
See: ThoughtCrimes Archive Anti-Semite Anti-Defamation League Jewish Defense League Persecuted doctors
[2010 Aug] Holocaust denier death, Mossad linked'
[2010 Aug] A Petition on behalf of Vincent Reynouard
 New police raid at my house by Robert Faurisson
The Persecution of Germar Rudolf
 Is there life after persecution? The botched execution of Fred Leuchter by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
[Ernst Nielsen] The 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel -- 1988
 Michael James: I Want My Freedom Back
 JEWISH MILITANTS: FIFTEEN YEARS -- AND MORE -- OF TERRORISM IN FRANCE by Professor Robert FAURISSON
 The Zionist Terror Network Background and Operation of the Jewish Defense League and other Criminal Zionist Groups
ONE THIRD OF THE HOLOCAUST 18: Physical Evidence part 1: Why we know more about a tsunami that hit in the year 1700 than what's underground at Treblinka. We also look at some excerpts from the movie "Mr. Death."
J. G. Burg (Joseph Ginsberg) Persecuted and beaten by Holocaust enforcers of Jewish Defense League type thugs. Denied burial in the Munich Jewish cemetery.
Ernst Zundel Three documented assassination attempts by fire and pipe bombs. Endless legal harassment leading to repeated jailings and bankrupting of his graphic arts business.
Ivan Lagace Became the target of several Royal Canadian Mounted Police raids. Resigned from his job as crematory director after receiving endless threats by anonymous callers and from thugs claiming to be the Jewish Defense League.
The Most Powerful Proof of the Holocaust By Martin Henry
Christopher Bollyn outside his home in suburban Chicago after being assaulted and tortured with a TASER by a three-man undercover tactical team in front of his wife and 8-year-old daughter in August 2006.
It is also clear that the Home Secretary (or someone acting for him) illegally ordered my arrest, imprisonment and deportation, knowing full well that I had entered the country legally and should have been left alone or, if later determined to be there illegally, at least permitted to leave. This plain violation of international law by the Home Secretary's Office was undoubtedly done to please the complaining Jewish groups which bear the ultimate responsibility.
Unfortunately, my clients -- the state governments -- are still intimidated by my Jewish persecutors. This continues to deprive me of my income, and it is not at all clear whether this will ever end.
I have been unable to apply for my state engineering license because no engineers have been willing to sign papers recommending me (which is a requirement), out of fear of retaliation. Without some official change in my status, such as a license, even the friendly state governments are afraid to deal with me. The major lawsuit we had planned against my persecutors is stalled, perhaps permanently, because of a lack of funds. And, although my findings will ultimately be accepted by all, I still have no contracts, have been unable to find work and have no income. It does not seem that this will improve in the near future.  Is there life after persecution? The botched execution of Fred Leuchter by Fred A. Leuchter, Jr.
The funny thing about Cole's retraction is that in a cosmic way it simply confirms what revisionists have been saying all along. For over twenty years, revisionists have said that the German confessions, wildly inaccurate and contradictory, were given not so much in response to direct physical torture as from the desire to protect themselves and above all their families from retaliation and hardship. For Cole's retraction, the JDL boasts that it was the result of their previous page, and that Cole "was afraid for his life and the relatives he supposedly is taking care of." So for those who didn't believe it possible that the Germans involved in the concentration camps could have been intimidated into make abject confessions, the idea is strikingly confirmed by Cole's retraction, and furthermore the JDL is waving the proof right under your nose. .......now we know what forces inspired both the confessions and the retraction. Because, you see, the most powerful proof of the Holocaust has always been the threat of force. The Most Powerful Proof of the Holocaust By Martin Henry
Academics like the Chinese professor Dr. K.T. Fann, a Marxist, and Dr. Gary Botting, who lost his teaching position at Red Deer College (Alberta) as a result of testifying at the Zündel trial in 1985, testified that the Harwood booklet was essentially a work of opinion, and hence not subject to legal prohibition. The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) by ROBERT FAURISSON
One can learn much about the psychology and methods of the
Thought Police by watching how they react when just one of their taboos is
broken and Holocaust Revisionism is given a public forum.
First they express outrage that such "offensive" and "dangerous" ideas were allowed to be expressed publicly. They avoid answering or debating these ideas, claiming that to do so would give the Revisionists a forum and legitimacy. Then they make vicious personal attacks against the Revisionist heretics, calling them political names such as "hater," "denier," "anti-Semite," "racist," "terrorist," or "neo-Nazi," even suggesting that they are potential mass murderers. They publicly accuse the Revisionists of lying, but they don’t allow the dissenters to hear the specific charge against them or to face their accusers so that they can answer this slander. THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf
Revisionists are frequently accused of being hate filled
people who are promoting a doctrine of hatred. But Revisionism is a scholarly
process, not a doctrine or an ideology. If the Holocaust promoters really want
to expose hatred, they should take a second look at their own doctrines, and a
long look at themselves in the mirror.
Anyone who invites a Revisionist to speak publicly is himself attacked for being insensitive. When Revisionists do speak publicly, they are regularly shouted down and threatened. Libraries and bookstores face intimidation when they consider handling Holocaust revisionist materials. All this goes on while the majority of library, media, college, and university administrators sit silently by, allowing political activists to determine what can be said in the media and read in libraries.
Next, the Thought Police set out to destroy the transgressor professionally and financially by "getting" him at his job or concocting a lawsuit against him. It is sometimes often deceptively claimed that Revisionist scholarship has been proven false during a trial, though courts of law can never decide any scholarly debates; they can only impose dogmas.
Finally, the Thought Police will inevitably "straighten out" that segment of academia or media that allowed the Revisionists a forum in the first place.
Some administrators in academia hold that university administrations should take action to rid the campus of ideas which are disruptive to universities. This is an open invitation to tyranny. It means that any militant group with "troops at the ready" can rid the campus of ideas it opposes and then impose its own orthodoxy. Coward administrators might find it much easier and safer to rid the campus of controversial ideas than to face down a group of screaming militants. But it is the duty of university administrators to insure that our universities remain a free marketplace of ideas. When ideas cause disruptions, it is the disrupters who must be subdued, not the ideas. THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY The Case For Open Debate An Introduction by Germar Rudolf
In 1979, after the showing of the film Holocaust in Sweden, Felderer began
receiving threatening telephone calls night and day. Stones were thrown through
his windows and he was attacked and hit over the head with an iron bar outside
his apartment. Felderer himself believed in non-violence as he believed truth
could never be obtained through violence. (19-4579, 4580,4581).....The second
flyer which formed part of the charge against him in Sweden was "Dokumentationszentrum
No. 468 - The Call for Volunteers" (Exhibit 79, entered 19 4555)), in which
Felderer reproduced a letter he had obtained anonymously. The letter, addressed
from a Christian Zionist group (Gesellschaft für christlich-jüdische
Zusammenarbeit Heidelberg) to a government Minister in Bonn, called for
Felderer's political persecution in Sweden. To Felderer, it proved that freedom
of speech was being suppressed through means no different from that of the
Soviet Union. As a result of publishing these flyers, Felderer was convicted on
the criminal charge of agitating against an ethnic group and received a ten
month prison sentence. Felderer testified both pamphlets were not anti-Jewish
but anti-Zionist. After three hunger strikes, Felderer was finally allowed to
have a paper and pen in his cell. (19-4546, 4552 to 4556)
...Felderer testified that he had been put into custody in a two by three metre bunker where he was not allowed any form of writing or even allowed to keep his watch. He did not know whether it was night or day and was constantly kept awake by radio noises. When he complained, the noise only increased. There was no washroom in the cell. He was escorted to the toilet and locked inside. He was struck several times in prison. Felderer went on a hunger strike three times until he was finally allowed some sort of normal action. He stated that such treatment wasn't given to hard criminals. He had simply published things which were satire, but this apparently was more dangerous than if he had raped a thousand Swedish women. There was no proportion at all to the punishment, and he denounced such actions. (20-4868, 4869) [Ditlieb Felderer] The 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel -- 1988
No other source for this vital data exists. And yet, the totals that derive from these vast archives cannot be found in any English-language published volume! This is the most important thing. I know of only two books, one French and one German, that cite these totals. Georges Theil in 'Heresy' cites the Arolsen total as 291,594 wartime deaths, and from this he derives a total of 'authenticated deaths in all the Hitlerite camps of detainees of Jewish origin' as under 200,000. (1) He is in jail, for publishing this volume. School Trips to Auschwitz
Germar Rudolf's volume had cited a similar figure, however he in addition surmised that there may have been a comparable number of such deaths that were non-authenticated. Thereby he reached a total figure of double this: 'A realistic estimate of the actual number of victims, therefore, may be twice as high as the total of victims registered by name in the records at Arolsen. ' (2) This volume has been banned and burnt throughout Germany and its brilliant Editor is in jail. School Trips to Auschwitz
My life became hell from the day in July 1974 when I was denounced by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Aharonoth. From 1974 to today I have suffered ten physical assaults, I've had countless court cases and convictions and have ended up being deprived of the right to teach at university. In France, in order to silence the revisionists that we are, the Jewish lobby got a special law passed, the Fabius-Gayssot Act of July 13, 1990, modelled on an Israeli law of July 1986. Laurent Fabius is a Socialist member of parliament, extremely rich and a Jew, whilst Jean-Claude Gayssot is a Communist MP. The Fabius-Gayssot Act provides for up to a years imprisonment, a fine of 45,000 and still other sanctions for those who challenge the alleged Holocaust . In nearly all the Western world, with or without any special law, revisionism is severely punished. A certain number of my revisionist colleagues or friends have been or are now in prison, some for long years, especially in Germany and Austria, countries with which no [real] peace treaty has yet been signed following the end of hostilities in 1945 and whose governments remain subject to the will of the victors of the Second World War. [2009 jan] Interview given by Professor Robert Faurisson
"In the Hebrew language, if you ever take the time to study the Old
Testament, you will learn that the word 'holocaust' is shorthand for 'a
burnt sacrificial offering to Hashem (the god of the Jews) in return for
certain favours.' It's neatly defined as such in the Jewish
encyclopaedia." .. it served a ritual purpose, often only involving the death of a
teething ram or a sheep. Modern Jewry no longer practises the ritual of
sacrificial 'holocaust' offerings, at least not officially."
......I was caught only once and the police officer, having given me a very stern lecture about riding without adequate protection, let me ride pillion on his bike all the way to the nearest tavern, whereupon he declared himself "off duty" and allowed me to buy him a beer. That was England in the 1970s. We were free. I truly mean this. Regardless of the loathsome class system, Englishmen enjoyed a quality of physical, spiritual and intellectual freedom that may never be repeated in our time. We were free to ask troublesome questions. If you disagreed with what was written in the history books, no policeman would arrive on your doorstep and take you in for questioning.  Michael James: I Want My Freedom Back
The most notorious of these murders was the assassination of an American
civil servant named Tom Soobzokov in Paterson N.J. in August of 1985. Because
Soobzokov had recently won a huge award in his $50 million lawsuit against
New York Times Books and a Zionist propagandist named Howard Blum, he had
been marked for death by the terrorists. Blum had written an exercise in
fantasy, "Wanted: The Search for Nazis in America", which devoted some 50 pages
to Soobzokov's alleged career as a Nazi, despite the fact that Blum's sources
had exonerated Soobzokov of all charges. The World Jewish Congress published a
letter from its director that Soobzokov's name had never appeared on a list of
war criminals; the Berlin Document Center, the world's most extensive
collection of papers on Nazis, had nothing adverse in its files; and 67 other
organizations which devoted their efforts to pursuing alleged war criminals
admitted that Soobzokov had never been listed as a war criminal. The Office of
Special Investigations, the Nesher group, had tried to have him deported but
gave up the effort when all of the charges were disproved.
After winning an award of millions of dollars, Soobzokov was denounced at a neighboring synagogue by Mordechai Levy, founder of the terrorist Jewish Defense League. In the next few days, a number of attempts were made on Soobzokov's life, culminating in a bombing which tore off his legs and caused his death 22 days later. The FBI and the police did nothing on the case, marking it "Unsolved" and placing it in the dead file. Victims By Eustace Mullins
I cited some of the methods used to silence historical revisionism in Australia in Censorship of Dissident Opinions, available from the ACLU. More drastic measures are used in some other countries. A Revisionist received a two-year jail sentence in Canada, a Revisionist in France was assassinated, Professor Faurisson was suspended from his teaching position in France, Henri Roques had his Ph.D. (granted for research on aspects on the Holocaust) revoked, a retired judge in West Germany had his law degree revoked and the plates of his book The Auschwitz Myth seized, other writers in West Germany have been jailed, and the headquarters and warehouse of the Institute for Historical Review was burnt to the ground in the U.S.A. For further information, write to the ACLU for a leaflet headed "The Worldwide Persecution of Dissent. " All of the attacks on Revisionists (including Jewish Revisionists) I have mentioned have one thing in common. They are subjected to character assassination but no, or very little, attempt is made to refute their arguments.  Revisionism and Censorship Down Under by John Bennett
Dissident thinkers who challenge the accepted version of the past cannot expect a fair hearing in Australia, are subject to "unmeasured vituperation" and are not given a fair hearing. Thus my attempts to query the extent of the Holocaust of Jews in World War II have led to me being described as "more evil than Himmler and Pol Pot" (Quadrant), a "pathological raver" (New Statesman), "unhinged" (Commentary), "comic" and "bizarre" (The Age), "scum" (3AW) and "dangerous and foolish" (Derryn Hinch, 3AW). A play written by a Jew from Sydney called "The Diary of Anne Frank -- a Forgery?" describes me as a vicious evil neo-Nazi professional propagandist who poses as a civil libertarian and is utterly discredited. I am not afforded a right of reply to such attacks.  Revisionism and Censorship Down Under by John Bennett
Robert Faurisson in a hospital bed following a nearly fatal attack by Zionist thugs on September 16, 1989.
After spraying a stinging gas into his
face, temporarily blinding him, three assailants punched him to the ground and
then repeatedly kicked him in the face and chest. The 60-year-old scholar, who
had been out walking his poodle in a park in his home town of Vichy, suffered a
broken jaw and severe head injuries. Physicians operated for four and a half
hours to repair his jaw and treat a broken rib and badly swollen face.
A group calling itself "The Sons of the Memory of the Jews" claimed responsibility for the savage attack. In a statement, the group threatened: "Professor Faurisson is the first, but will not be the last. Let those who deny the Shoah [Holocaust] beware." While French police officially would acknowledge only that "three young Jewish activists from Paris" had carried out the assault, the attackers are strongly suspected to have been with the Tagar/Betar organization.  The Zionist Terror Network Background and Operation of the Jewish Defense League and other Criminal Zionist Groups
Francois Duprat. Because of his skeptical view of the Holocaust extermination story, this gifted French educator was murdered in a 1978 bomb blast.
In France, François Duprat -- a gifted young historian, educator, and
prolific writer -- was murdered in 1978, thereby becoming the first person to be
killed because of his support for Holocaust revisionism. Duprat had publicized
the writings of former concentration camp inmate Paul Rassinier, distributed a
booklet, Did Six Million Really Die?, and had published a revisionist article of
his own, "The Mystery of the Gas Chambers."
As a result of such activism, the 38-year-old teacher was assassinated on March 18, 1978, when the car he was driving was blown up in a bomb blast. His wife, who was with him, lost the use of her legs in the attack. A Jewish "Remembrance Commando" and a "Jewish Revolutionary Group" promptly claimed responsibility for the murder. So sophisticated was the attack that it is difficult to believe that no government agency was involved.  Revisionism and Censorship Down Under by John Bennett
On January 22, 1992, revisionist activist David Cole was attacked by JDL thugs at a meeting held at the University of California at Los Angeles. Before the meeting began, JDL leader Rubin first tried to push the youthful Cole down a flight of stairs. JDL hoodlums also harassed and pushed around meeting organizer Robert Morrissey. After the meeting commenced, JDL punks tried to shout down the speakers, and then threw food at Cole. Finally, a JDL thug assaulted Cole -- who is Jewish -- hitting him in the face and bloodying his nose.
David Cole at the 1992 IHR Conference. He was attacked by JDL thugs at a meeting in January 1992 at the University of California at Los Angeles.
The tumult was recorded on videotape by a camera crew of the CBS television news program "48 Hours," as well as by news crews of two local Los Angeles television stations. Neither of the two local stations mentioned a word of the incident in their nightly news broadcasts. Similarly, CBS officials decided not to air even a second of this outburst, not even in a segment about Holocaust revisionism that was part of the CBS television network's hour-long magazine-format program "48 Hours" broadcast of February 26, 1992. Network officials apparently decided that scenes of Zionist hoodlums beating a young Jewish revisionist would not "fit" with the image of revisionism that CBS wanted to project to its many viewers.  The Zionist Terror Network Background and Operation of the Jewish Defense League and other Criminal Zionist Groups
David Willcox (left) at a demonstration in Washington, DC, April 22, 1993, to protest the new US Holocaust Memorial Museum. A short time after this picture was taken, Zionist hoodlums attacked and seriously injured him. (Photo by Fred Burkhart)
Thomas Marcellus, Director of the Institute for Historical Review, sorts damaged files from the wreckage of the devastating arson attack on July 4, 1984, against the southern California research and publication center.
Attorney Jürgen Rieger
Attacked and beaten. Car blown up. Professional reputation and career ruined.
Background and contribution:
Long-time Z¸ndel attorney in Germany, Rieger has been a defender of German patriots since his law school days. He has drawn the ire of the Holocaust Enforcers by winning the 1981 Z¸ndel case in Stuttgart against the false claim that Z¸ndel had published "hate literature", and winning several cases against the German vassal regime who had confiscated Z¸ndel's postal bank account, unfreezing DM 30,000 in the process. He also managed to regain for Z¸ndel his confiscated German passport - after a six-year legal battle. Rieger was attacked and beaten unconscious in broad daylight after leaving a Hamburg courthouse and had to be airlifted, near death, by helicopter to the trauma unit of the hospital of Hamburg University, where he lay unconscious for days. The assailants escaped after their assassination attempt. German police later caught one Turkish "guest worker" who was tried - and let go! The other culprits were never found.