RONALD REAGAN: ILLUMINATI TOOL
February 6, 2011
The Reagan myth is still useful to
the Illuminati in duping and misdirecting people who hold traditional values.
by Rollin Stearns
The past few days have seen a burst of
contrived media celebration of Ronald Reagan. The excuse has been the 100th
anniversary of his birth.
The real reason is that Reagan -- the Reagan myth -- is still useful to the
Illuminati in duping and misdirecting people who hold traditional values.
In truth, Reagan was an enemy of these values. He was a highly paid puppet of
the Illuminati who let himself be used by those who want to destroy everything
he pretended to stand for.
I have to admit he had me fooled too. Back in 1980, people wanted to be rid of
the feckless Jimmy Carter. Reagan seemed strong and sincere, upbeat and
conservative. To me, he seemed like a man you could trust.
A big mistake. Unfortunately, he's still got most people fooled. So let's review
the career of Ronald Reagan, and see who the real man was.
THE REAL REAGAN
First, Reagan was a left-wing Democrat who admired Franklin Roosevelt, the
president who revolutionized America by turning the Republic into an Empire.
(See Burden of Empire by Garet Garrett.) Even to the end of his career,
Reagan was praising Roosevelt.
Later, about the time he divorced his first wife (Jane Wyman) and met Nancy
Davis (the daughter of one of Eleanor Roosevelt's intimates), he underwent a
"conversion" to "anti-communism." This was the foundation of his reputation as
No surprise here, though. In the late 1940s, lots of left-wing liberals were
turning against the Communists -- many to save their own skins from the
revelations of treason that were coming out.
Even when this was not the motive, their "anti-Communism" often meant no more
than anti-Stalinism. Trotskyites -- who thought of themselves as true Communists
-- hated Stalin's guts and hated the Soviet Union. Later, many of them became
the so-called "neo-conservatives" who took over Buckley's National Review,
and then, with the election of Reagan, the Republican Party.
But what about Reagan's opposition to the "evil empire"? What about his big
defense build-up that forced the Soviet Union into insolvency? What about his
partnership with John-Paul II to free Poland and Eastern Europe?
All this was just part of the Illuminati plan to take the dialectic (capitalist
West vs. communist East) to the next level. Gorbachev and Reagan were the
appointed leaders to bring about the end of the bipolar world, so that the age
of globalization could emerge.
In fact, at their summit at Reykjavik in 1986, Reagan proposed to Gorbachev that
America be radically disarmed. Even liberals were stunned by the scope of
But behind the scenes, the American military rebelled, and the accounts of the
summit were sanitized and forgotten. The following year Reagan gave his "Mr.
Gorbachev, tear down this wall" performance and when the wall did come down,
Reagan became "the man who defeated Communism."
Reagan's "patriotism" suffered other lapses as well. In 1986 he signed off on
amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. You would think as a man of common sense
and alleged economic literacy, Reagan would have known that when you reward
something, you get more of it. Was the Gipper out to lunch?
And then there was "Iran-Contra." Reagan was fearlessly fighting the Commies in
Central America, but didn't know that Ollie North was selling arms to Iran to
finance this holy war. Out to lunch again?
It was at this point that I ceased to be a "conservative." All the conservatives
I knew seemed to be gaga over North. Where I come from, his actions are known
aside: Fawn Hall,left, North's personal secretary -- a sensitive position that
is carefully vetted -- was the daughter of Henry Kissinger's personal secretary.
And Reagan had put Kissinger in charge of Central American policy.)
CHAMPION OF SMALL GOVERNMENT
But what about other Reagan policies? Didn't he reduce taxes? Didn' t he reduce
the size of government to "get it off our backs," as he pledged?
Reagan's career was the triumph of rhetoric over reality. When he ran for
President, he promised to put an end to the Departments of Education and Energy.
Instead, he strengthened and entrenched them. (He also added a new bureaucracy,
the Department of Veterans Affairs.)
As for taxes, he cut them in 1981 -- one of his signature accomplishments. But
the same year he increased Social Security taxes (excuse me, I mean "insurance
premiums"), and in the following years he found other ways to raise taxes
without seeming to do so. At the end of his two terms most Americans were paying
more in taxes than ever.
After eight years of Reagan the government was
larger than ever. The budget was more than 50 percent higher than it was
under Carter. And the budget deficit had tripled.
This was due above all to the huge increase in military spending. The
military-industrial complex (that Eisenhower had warned against) thrived as it
hadn't since the days of World War II.
CHAMPION OF CHRISTIAN VALUES
Wasn't Reagan pro-life? A Christian? A family man? Once again, when it came to
things like abortion, Reagan talked a great game. But his Supreme Court Justices
gave us Roe v. Wade).
His first appointment was an unqualified woman (O'Connor) with little judicial
experience and no discernible judicial philosophy. She was selected for the same
reason that Sotomayor and Kagan were: she was a female. And she was no
In all, Reagan appointed three justices. Later, two of them (predictably
including O'Connor) voted to uphold Roe v. Wade in Casey v. Planned Parenthood.
(Casey was a critical case: a change in just one of those two votes would have
And then there was the Bork nomination. Robert Bork was the most qualified
nominee in a generation. But when Teddy Kennedy launched his breathtakingly
vitriolic attack on Bork, what did Reagan do?
Nothing. He remained silent. The man who extolled the presidency as a great
"bully pulpit" -- who might have saved his own nominee if he had just fought for
him -- instead let him hang out to dry.
So there we have Reagan -- the man who as Governor of California signed the
first no-fault divorce bill into law; the man whose official schedule was set by
his wife according to astrological conjunctions; the man whose whole political
career was subsidized by global corporations (GE, Bechtel, etc.) -- the man who
spent his whole life play-acting a script written by others.
Was he evil? Did he know what he was doing? Or was he truly out to lunch? The
latter might explain Reagan's uncanny ability to seem anti-government even as he
enlarged the government's role.
What was Reagan's overriding role? And why does it matter now? Picture two men,
one at each end of a cross-cut saw. They're cutting down a tree.
To the casual observer it looks at first as if the two are working against each
other: as one moves forward, the other goes back, and vice versa. But of course
they're working together to achieve a common goal.
In the same way, "liberals" and "conservatives," Republicans and Democrats, seem
to be working against each other. But they're really working together.
One part will move the country to the left, when the times permit (e.g., because
of depression or war). Then, when people become alarmed and resist the move, the
other ("opposition") party will come in.
But instead of restoring the balance, they will merely stop (or slow) the
leftward movement. They will consolidate it, until it's time for the next move
In this way the center of gravity moves ever leftward. And what was unthinkable
a generation ago becomes mainstream today.
To enact this little dialectic you need some good (or passable) actors, such as
Ronald Reagan. That way you control the opposition. You get people who have
traditional values to vote for their own destruction.
Rollin Stearns is a former book editor who lives in Maine.
Further reading: Here's
the Rest of Him (1968) and The Counterfeit Candidate (1976), both by
Related- The Corruption of
Ronald Reagan by Dan Moldea
Comments for "RONALD REAGAN: ILLUMINATI TOOL"