Bill Gates to roll out remote control microchip-based sterilization of women
Thursday, July 23, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes
(NaturalNews) When Bill Gates, along with Paul Allen, began
a little tech venture called "Microsoft" in a garage in 1975, he couldn't
possibly have imagined that the company would grow into the largest personal
computer company and most widely used PC operating system on the planet.
Or make him the richest man in the known galaxy.
But all of that happened, of course, and for the last two decades Gates, through his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have been involved in socially engineering the world to be a place they want to mold in an image theyhave devised.
In recent months Gates has taken his vision a step further, with the development of computer chip technology that will essentially serve as one element of his quest for population control and reduction.
As reported by the Activist Post's Heather Callaghan, soon medical microchip implants will be introduced to the general population, which will serve as "the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology."
"Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak," she added.
From 'pro-choice' to 'no-choice'
Perhaps not surprisingly - given its propensity to favor
technology that reduces planetary human presence - the same developers who are
bringing wireless, remote-controlled implants are currently focused on a product
that is the cornerstone of future efforts: Gates Foundation-funded birth
control microchip implants.
Callaghan notes that wireless technology allows the remotely controlled chips to essentially activate a woman's ability to conceive, or prevent it, at will, which amounts to temporarysterilization (if a decision is made, say by an all-powerful government agency, to prevent a woman from bearing a child). Government in the U.S. would instantly transform itself from "pro-choice" (through the permission of abortion) to no choice.
The writer also observed:
Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, "the ability to conceive by whose will?" This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a "woman's right to choose" - would it not?
What's more, the chips are encrypted, so no hacking - not by cyber criminals or by technologically clever souls who are simply trying to bypass a government's oppression.
The microchip is implantable into arms, hips or somewhere on a woman's back. The development of the chip was kept under wraps while researchers and scientists worked to complete work the past couple of years. But the existence of the chip was finally confirmed publicly as beta testing of the technology is scheduled to begin towards the end of 2015, when volunteers will be sought.
If poor women are the target, why encrypt the chips?
As reported by TWCN:
The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute's Chip Foundation and Bill Gates' Foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.
The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018. The main target of these chips are women in third world who are often subject to pain and risks of death during early pregnancies.
That report noted that the chip is expected to remain viable for at least 16 years once implanted.
While the "target" population is poor, third-world women, such technology is, of course, ripe for abuse. After all, think about it: If that demographic is the primary target, why would the chips need to be encrypted? How many third-world populations have within their midst the technological capability or the power to resist?
When he began Microsoft, Bill Gates likely never thought he'd become rich enough to hold the power of life in his hands. Talk about your "evil corporations."