Anti-Breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants
 Breastfeeding  & Bottle-feeding

[The Pharma Bible Journal of the Vaccine industry from their front men, the American Academy of Pediatrics  wants us to stop using the word 'natural' in regards to Breastfeeding?  Maybe they should have disguised the fact they are funded by vaccine and baby milk companies, a little better?  This is the industry that sells us vaccines, proven 100% useless and highly dangerous!!  Talk about propaganda, the real system of immunity was as God intended (why they flog Atheism to death, the Religion Racket being the main entity doing that in a clever disguised backhand way), which works perfectly fine, until the vax quacks got in and buggered it up with their poisons known as vaccines.  The fact they can cure all the vaccine disease easily with Vitamin C proves they have a hidden agenda, and the smallpox vaccine production pictures with the accompanying text proves their intent was to kill and spread disease, see Smallpox vax. But you have to admire their cheek, and brass neck into believing anyone would fall for such Psychopathic, Satanic/diabolical, bollocks.]

[The Neil Z. Miller  Follow · 9 hrs near Santa Fe, NM, United States · The journal Pediatrics wants everyone to stop calling breastfeeding “natural” because it may cause people to believe that natural is better, and this will undermine public health objectives regarding vaccination (which is not natural). Here is a quote from the article: 
“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants. This messaging plays into a powerful perspective that ‘natural’ approaches to health are better, a view examined in a recent report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier. This may ultimately challenge public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination.”  http://pediatrics.aappublications.

"There was an interesting study done in Australia. They had four groups – breastfed and vaccinated, breast-fed and unvaccinated, bottle fed and vaccinated and bottle fed and unvaccinated… They looked at respiratory illness… The lowest instance of respiratory illness was in breastfed and unvaccinated. What was interesting was what was the second lowest; bottle fed and unvaccinated. That was shocking. This said that breast feeding wasn’t as important as not vaccinating your child."   ~  Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, Homefront Medical Director, Chicago

  According to a new theory being proposed by University of Albany evolutionary psychologist Gordon Gallup and his colleagues, the decision to bottle-feed is tantamount, in the mother’s psyche, to mourning the loss of the child. At least, that’s how a woman’s body seems to respond to the absence of a suckling infant at its breasts in the wake of a successful childbirth. In a soon-to-be-published article in Medical Hypotheses, the authors argue that bottle-feeding simulates the unsettling ancestral condition of an infant’s death:
    Opting not to breastfeed precludes and/or brings all of the processes involved in lactation to a halt. For most of human evolution the absence or early cessation of breastfeeding would have been occasioned by miscarriage, loss, or death of a child. We contend, therefore, that at the level of her basic biology a mother’s decision to bottle feed unknowingly simulates child loss.[2009] Breasts in Mourning: How Bottle-Feeding Mimics Child Loss in Mothers’ Brains By Jesse Bering

Infant formula feeding robs the developing brain of those essential biochemical nutrients, particularly the essential amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine, that are necessary for the normal development of the brain neurotransmitters serotonin and dopamine, which mediate the emotional behaviours of peace or violence; of happiness or depression and suicide.--- James W Prescott, Ph.D. (2007). Why breastfeeding mothers are important. The Mother Sept/Oct 2007.

"There is literature that baby milks lack the oils essential and that  there   is   possibly  an   association  with   poor  brain development but nothing is done about it....Ettissh describes how baby milks are used to greatly reduce our intellect; they do not support proper brain development due to a lack of nutrients called essential fatty  acids, EFA'S.  These EFA'S  are   deliberately  excluded,  even  today Scientists are suppressed,  even killed:  'we don't add them do we- that's deliberate - we don't let the scientists find out - we suppress it - we are the baby milks - we are in all of the baby milks e. g. Nestle, cow and gate, any baby milk company, we're them.  We've killed a baby milk scientist - you'd know him, he's quite well known- heart attack, encircling stuff — he was convinced we were wrong and tried to tell other people.' "  The Body Snatchers by Susan Reed BSC