Church Committee reports
CIA Targeted Assassinations by Induced Heart Attack and
Church Committee hearings
Thu, 16 Dec 2010
In 1975, during the Church Committee hearings, the existence of a secret
assassination weapon came to light. The CIA had developed a poison that
caused the victim to have an immediate heart attack. This poison could
be frozen into the shape of a dart and then fired at high speed from a
pistol. The gun was capable of shooting the icy projectile with enough
speed that the dart would go right through the clothes of the target and
leave just a tiny red mark. Once in the body the poison would melt and
be absorbed into the blood and cause a heart attack! The poison was
developed to be undetectable by modern autopsy procedures.
Can you give a person cancer?
If cancer in animals can be caused by injecting
them with cancer viruses and bacteria, it
would certainly be possible to do the same with human beings!
In 1931, Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist from the Rockefeller Institute
for Medical Research, purposely infects human test subjects in Puerto
Rico with cancer cells; 13 of them died. Though a Puerto Rican doctor
later discovers that Rhoads purposely covered up some of the details of
his experiment and Rhoads himself gives a written testimony stating he
believes that all Puerto Ricans should be killed, he later goes on to
establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Fort Detrick
Maryland (origin of the HIV/AIDS virus, the Avian Flu virus and the
Swine Flu / A-H1N1 virus), Utah and Panama, and is named to the U.S.
Atomic Energy Commission, where he begins a series of radiation exposure
experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.
The answer to the question – Can you give a person cancer – is yes.
After nearly 80 years of research and development there is now a way to
simulate a real heart attack and to give a healthy person cancer. Both
have been used as a means of assassination. Only a very skilled
pathologist, who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could
distinguish an assassination induced heart attack or cancer from the
Is death by heart attack, burst aneurysm, of cerebral hemorrhage a
“natural cause”? Not if government agencies have found a way to
influence your heart rate, blood pressure, or vascular dilatation.
Neurological research has found that the brain has specific frequencies
for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your
chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the
heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart
attack. In this way, high profile leaders of political parties who are
prone to heart attacks can be killed off before they cause any trouble.
Jack Ruby died of cancer a few weeks after his conviction for murder had
been overruled in appeals court and he was ordered to stand trial
outside of Dallas – thus allowing him to speak freely if he so desired.
There was little hesitancy in Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald in
order to prevent him from talking, so there is no reason to suspect that
any more consideration would have been shown Jack Ruby if he had posed a
threat to people in the US government who had conspired to murder the
president of the United States – John F Kennedy.
Matt Simmons, an oil industry expert, was assassinated for turning
whistle blower over the Obama administration coverup of the BP Gulf Oil
Spill. Investment banker Matt Simmons, who died suddenly, was an energy
industry insider and presidential adviser whose profile soared when he
wrote that Saudi Arabia is running out of oil and world production is
peaking. Simmons, 67, died at his vacation home in Maine. An autopsy by
the state medical examiner’s office concluded Monday that he died from
accidental drowning “with heart disease as a contributing factor.”
His 2005 best-selling book, Twilight
in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy,
brought him a wider audience. The book argued that Saudi Arabia vastly
overstated the size of its oil reserves and that the world was on the
verge of a severe oil shortage as the largest oil fields become
depleted. This revelation is backed up by Iran. Iran knows the Middle
East oil supply is quickly drying up and for that reason it is now
focusing on building nuclear reactors. Once the oil runs out Iran will
be the only country in the Middle East that will be energy
self-sufficient. All of the other Middle Eastern countries, including
Saudi Arabia will become Third World impoverished states.
Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was also assassinated. He
was found dead in the detention center at The Hague tribunal. Mr
Milosevic faced charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for
his alleged central role in the wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo
during the 1990s. He also faced genocide charges over the 1992-95 Bosnia
war, in which 100,000 people died.
Milosevic wrote a letter one day before his death claiming he was being
poisoned to death in jail. An autopsy verified his claim as it showed
that Milosevic’s body contained a drug that rendered his usual
medication for high blood pressure and his heart condition ineffective,
causing the heart attack that led to his death.
Former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson told reporters that he saw documents
in 1992 that discussed assassinating Milosevic by means of a staged car
accident, where the driver would be blinded by a flash of light and
remote controlled brake failure enacted to cause the crash. This exact
same technique was utilized for real in the murder of Princess Diana.
If Milosevic was murdered, who would ultimately be responsible? NATO.
Because, though the ICTY (or ‘Hague Tribunal’) presents itself to the
world as a UN body, NATO officials have themselves made clear, in
public, that it really belongs to NATO. NATO appointed the prosecutors,
and the judges who ruled out investigating any war crimes accusations
against NATO. It follows that Slobodan Milosevic, who was a prisoner of
the Hague Tribunal’s Scheveningen prison when he died, was a prisoner of
NATO. NATO had both motive and opportunity to kill him.
In March 2002, Milosevic presented the NATO controlled Hague tribunal
with FBI documents proving that both the United States government and
NATO provided financial and military support for Al-Qaeda to aid the
Kosovo Liberation Army in its war against Serbia. This didn’t go down
too well at the Pentagon and the White House, who at the time were
trying to sell a war on terror and gearing up to justify invading Iraq.
During Milosevic’s trial for war crimes NATO alleged that the Serbs had
committed a massacre of Albanian civilians in the Kosovo town of Racak.
Evidence presented in the court showed that NATO’s claim was a hoax.
This is especially embarrassing because the allegation of a massacre at
Racak was the excuse that NATO used to begin bombing the Serbs on 24
March 1999 (the carpet bombing were done by the United States Air Force
-authorized by then president Bill and Hillary Clinton). Then NATO
claimed that the Serbs had supposedly been murdering 100,000 Albanian
civilians. However, NATO’s own forensics reported that they could not
find even one body of an Albanian civilian murdered by Milosevic’s
forces. The failure to find any bodies eventually led to NATO’s absurd
claim that the Serbs had supposedly covered up the genocide by moving
the many thousands of bodies in freezer trucks deep into Serbia (while
Bill Clinton was carpet bombing the place) without leaving a single
trace of evidence. But the Hague tribunal showed these accusations to be
entirely fraudulent as well.
Milosevic made several speeches in which he discussed how a group of
shadowy internationalists had caused the chaos in the Balkans because it
was the next step on the road to a “new world order.”
During a February 2000 Serbian Congressional speech, Milosevic stated,
“Small Serbia and people in it have demonstrated that resistance is
possible. Applied at a broader level, it was organized primarily as
a moral and political rebellion against tyranny, hegemony,
monopolism, generating hatred, fear and new forms of violence and
revenge against champions of freedom among nations and people, such
a resistance would stop the escalation of modern time inquisition.
Uranium bombs, computer manipulations, drug-addicted young assassins
and bribed of blackmailed domestic thugs, promoted to the allies of
the new world order, these are the instruments of inquisition which
have surpassed, in their cruelty and cynicism, all previous forms of
revengeful violence committed against the mankind in the past.”
Evidence linking Milosevic to genocides like Srebrenica, in which 7,000
Muslims died, was proven to be fraudulent. In fact, Srebrenica was a ‘UN
safe zone’, yet just like Rwanda, UN peacekeepers deliberately withdrew and
allowed the massacre to unfold, then blamed Milosevic. Milosevic’s exposure
of UN involvement in the Srebrenica massacre was another reason why tribunal
transcripts were heavily edited and censored by NATO, and another
contributing factor for NATO to murder him while he was in their
custody.NATO’s Hague Tribunal was clearly a kangaroo court whose sole
purpose was to convince ordinary people all over the world that NATO’s
destruction of Yugoslavia was justified. Since NATO failed to show this in
its own court (a total absence of evidence did make this difficult), there
is indeed a powerful NATO motive to murder Milosevic – to prevent his
acquittal. In this way, NATO can continue to claim that Milosevic was
guilty, and nobody would begin to look into the mountain of evidence that
showed that it was NATO leaders (particularly US president Bill Clinton) who
committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Yugoslavia.
So many people have been done in by cancer at a convenient time in history
that it is now time to ask the question “who is assassinating people by
giving their target cancer or inducing a massive heart attack”? Who ordered
the hits and why?
Mr. Charles Senseney, a CIA weapon developer at Fort Detrick, Maryland,
testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in September 1975 where
he described an umbrella poison dart gun he had made. He said it was always
used in crowds with the umbrella open, firing through the webing so it would
not attract attention. Since it was silent, no one in the crowd could hear
it and the assassin merely would fold up the umbrella and saunter away with
Video footage of the assassination of John F Kennedy shows this umbrella gun
being used in Dealey Plaza. Video evidence of the events of November 22,
1963 shows that the first shot fired on the fateful day had always seemed to
have had a paralytic effect on Kennedy. His fists were clenched and his
head, shoulders and arms seemed to stiffen. An autopsy revealed that there
was a small entrance wound in his neck but no evidence of a bullet path
through his neck and no bullet was ever recovered that matched that small
Charles Senseney testified that his Special Operations Division at Fort
Detrick had received assignments from the CIA to develop exotic weaponry.
One of the weapons was a hand-held dart gun that could shoot a poison dart
into a guard dog to put it out of action for several hours. The dart and the
poison left no trace so that examination would not reveal that the dogs had
been put out of action. The CIA ordered about 50 of these weapons and used
Senseney said that the darts could have been used to kill human beings and
he could not rule out the possibility that this had been done by the CIA.A
special type of poison developed for the CIA induces a heart attack and
leaves no trace of any external influence unless an autopsy is conducted to
check for this particular poison. The CIA revealed this poison in various
accounts in the early 1970s. The CIA even revealed the weapon that fired
those darts that induces a heart attack at a congressional hearing.
The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave
nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart,
the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a
mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart
completely disintegrates upon entering the target. The lethal poison then
rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is
done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to
detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural