Mass Murder Inc  French Revolution

French Revolution's Hidden Depopulation Agenda

August 30, 2011 http://www.henrymakow.com/french_revolutions_depopulatio.html



The revolutionaries "acted upon the prompting of the originators of depopulation theory, the scholars (like Jeremy Bentham) of the British East India Company (BEIC) a/k/a Illuminati Bankers. 

by Andrew Smith
(henrymakow.com)

 
The popular version of the French Revolution told by today's mainstream media is a monstrous falsehood. This "Tale of Two Cities" account has the Storming of the Bastille and The Reign of Terror happening for the benefit of France. Nothing could be further from the truth.

 
The assault on the Bastille was a fraud. Professional terrorists told Parisians a Royalist Army marched on Paris to destroy them and that everyone in Paris should therefore arm themselves from the armory at the Bastille. But there was no armory at the Bastille and there were few weapons. And the storming was not to free political prisoners. There were no political prisoners in the Bastille. Bastille Day therefore represents a day of French slaughter and disgrace, although extravagantly celebrated each year on July 14.

 
The Reign of Terror was a thoroughly malicious pre-Marxist depopulation program. According to Hyperhistory.net.

"Pol Pot's regime is surprisingly similar to the French Revolution, 200 years before. Both revolutions began in the French capitol of Paris. Both revolutions conducted deadly purges, resulting in the death of many. Also, when they took over, both Pol Pot and the French declared, 'This is the year zero.' They both made their own 10 day calendar and rejected the thought of any God. Both revolutions were curtailed within a decade."

And both were financed by the Illuminati Bankers.

 
After the radical Jacobin (French proto-communists) leaders guillotined the monarchy and the moderates within the Revolutionary Convention, they seized power with a vengeance and immediately commenced the mass murder that today we call the Reign of Terror.

Firmly in control by the spring of 1793, they calmly and carefully discussed the proportion of the French population to be suppressed to make France a model (communist) republic.

Before the genocide began, the population of France was 25,000,000. In early 1793 Jean Bon St André openly stated in the Revolutionary Convention, "[I]n order to establish the Republic securely in France, the population must be reduced by more than half."

More radical leaders made even more gruesome proposals. Maximilien Robespierre, the most aggressive annihilation advocate, blithely proposed that 23,000,000 be culled from the French census. 

 
We should consider whether Robespierre and the other French Jacobin could ever have dreamed up such a massive depopulation program on their own.

How could they believe that such a program of murder and mayhem could possibly benefit France? Obviously, they acted upon the prompting of the originators of depopulation theory, the scholars (like Jeremy Bentham) of the British East India Company (BEIC) a/k/a Illuminati Bankers. The first BEIC experiment in depopulation occurred 20 years earlier, the Bengal famine of 1770 (10,000,000 dead). 

 
According to Jeffery Steinberg's April 1994 EIR essay, "The Bestial British Intelligence Of Shelburne and Bentham":

"Speeches were prepared by Bentham and translated and transported by diplomatic pouch and other means to Paris, where leaders of the Jacobin Terror, Jean-Paul Marat, Georges Jacques Danton, and Maximilien de Robespierre delivered the fiery oratories. Records of East India Company payments to these leading Jacobins are still on file at the British Museum."

How else could buffoons like Robespierre (35 years old) and St Just (27 years old) take control of France and lay waste to it? How could a simple minded, miserable worm like Pol Pot take command of the Cambodian genocide 200 years later?

 
Fortuitously stopped, the French "Reign of Terror" statistics never reached the lofty heights Robespierre dreamed of. After killing no more than 2,000,000, the Terror abruptly ended after the Revolutionary Convention rebelled and turned on Robespierre on July 27, 1794?

Why did they turn on Robespierre? The Jacobins sickened of the endless slaughter of innocent French people. Robespierre and St Just followed the Duc d'Orleans and their sick conspirators to the gallows on July 28, 1794.

Maybe if they had marched the people of France to the French countryside and done their genocide out of sight, the Jacobins could have been more successful like their communist successor, Pol Pot, in Cambodia in the 1970s. But it took sick Illuminati minds another 200 years to dream up the Cambodian KILLING FIELDS.

 

Robespierre and St Just met their end in a truly extraordinary turn of events. They were never an absolute dictatorship but acted through the authority of the National Revolutionary Convention.
 

Throughout 1794, they attacked their most trusted allies sending them to the guillotine one by one but when they turned on their closest allies within the Committee of Public Safety, the convention revolted in what came to be known as the Thermidorian Reaction. 

With the execution of Robespierre, Paris exploded into spontaneous celebration. The remaining Jacobins, the so-called Thermidorians (seeing the joy of the French people after they guillotined Robespierre and St Just) lost their nerve and abandoned the depopulation scheme.
 

Nesta Webster attributes the end of the Reign of Terror to the spontaneous goodness of the people of Paris and she's probably correct, because the remaining leaders of the National Convention ended the terror. 

"The Thermidoriens [] finding themselves greeted on the morning of the 10th of Thermidor (July 29, 1794) by a rapturous crowd as the deliverers of France, were quick to see that their best chance of popularity lay in accepting the role assigned to them.  If the people thought that in overthrowing Robespierre they had intended to overthrow the system of the Terror, well, they would stop the Terror and shift all the blame for the past from their own shoulders by making Robespierre the scapegoat of the whole Terrorist party. 
 

"For the purpose that had inspired the Robespierristes to reduce the population these opportunists cared nothing, and they were ready to fall in with any régime provided only they themselves could cling to place and power.

"The Thermidorien reaction was thus not the work of a political party, but a really popular movement brought about by the force of the people's will, which, for the first time since the beginning of the Revolution, triumphed over the designs of the demagogues." Nesta Webster, The French Revolution: A Study in Democracy (1919), p. 475---

Also by Andrew Smith  "French Didn't Have a Revolution"

Cheryl said (August 31, 2011):
 

Will there be another "Reign of Terror"? Some people have seen a signal, an insider-type
telegraphing message, in the March 25, 2011, statement by Pope Benedict XVI:

"...a great court has been created in order to give a fresh impetus to respectful and friendly encounter between people of differing convictions... Religions have nothing to fear from a just secularity, one that is open and allows individuals to live in accordance with what they believe according to their conscience. If we are to build a world of liberty, equality and fraternity, then believers and non-believers must feel free to be just that, equal in their right to live as individuals and in community in accordance with their convictions; and fraternal in their relations with one another.”

Reference: http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/B16_post_election_heresies.php

The true history of the French Revolution, as pointed out in the article by Andrew Smith, has been completely covered-up. Among the information almost universally ignored is that
literally thousands of Roman Catholic priests and nuns were among the slaughtered 2,000,000. Many were tortured and then murdered in the equivalent of modern day prison camps.

As Pope Benedict XVI publicly supports the so-called Catholic Church in Communist China today, he has at the same time ignored the plight of those Catholic clergy and laity
in mainland China who are imprisoned, tortured, and killed when they do not compromise with the government's version of Christianity. Instead, on June 30, 2007, he ordered
them to comply in an official document released by the Vatican: "Letter of the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI to the Bishops, Priests, Consecrated Persons and Lay Faithful
of the Catholic Church in the People's Republic of China", links at:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/letters/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20070527_china_en.html
"Benedict Delivers Chinese Underground Catholics to Communisits" http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/m014rpBetrayal_of_China.html

TSG said (August 31, 2011):
 

Although I get lost jumping from chapter to chapter, Thomas Carlyle's depiction of these events is an awfully handy guide as to what to expect, and perhaps 'how not to handle' the coming "North American Revolution" that is intended to accomplish total integration between the US, Canada and Mexico. As to the 'reign of terror,' go figure which group of 'rebels' will be leading that brigade... !
 

Dan said (August 31, 2011):
 

Mark Twain said, "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."

If you are watching the so called "Libyan Revolution" very closely, and study Nesta Webster's "World Revolution"
you will be 'enlightened' to the pattern of Illuminati "revolutions". The basic formula is recognizable after all these years.

Same goes for the whole 'Arab Spring'. The February MSM candy coated facade of 'People's democratic Facebook and Twitter Revolutions' has melted to reveal the ugly face of Illuminati war on the world just as it did with the French Reign of Terror.

The Rebel commander who is now in charge of Triopoli, known last week as the heroic bab al-azizziya, is AbdulHakim Belhadj, Al-Qaida veteran. After getting a degree in civil engineering in 1988, he trained and fought with the Taliban in Afghanistan. He was captured in Maylasia in 2004 by the CIA and released for his mission in Libya in 2008. He became an emir of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), on Homeland Security's list as an international terrorist NGO.

Sounds like a Al-CIA-duh asset to me.
Commander of Tripoli and Victim of American Rendition
"He is now the military leader in Tripoli, who on the night of liberation drew parallels between the fight in Tripoli and the conquest of Mecca while surrounded by several others celebrating around him. "
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/08/30/abdulhakim-belhadj-commander-of-tripoli-and-victim-of-american-rendition/

It would appear that Obama has spent another trillion dollars to help NATO set up Al Quaida with a new base of operations on the Mediterranean in the heart of the Middle East.
http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=1&id=26357