Schoolgirl Suffers Adverse Reaction After Four Vaccines At School Without Parental Consent
By Christina England |March 9th, 2012 http://vactruth.com
A 14 year girl has had an adverse reaction to one of four vaccines that she received at the Marcus Garvey Academy, Detroit, against her mothers wishes. On the 30th January 2012 the young teenager was taken from her classroom without warning and given four vaccinations including the cervical cancer vaccine the HPV, a vaccine her mother was very much against her having.
The first that Ms Sighli Kinney knew about her daughter’s ordeal was when she was handed an envelope containing a vaccination record. Ms Kinney was horrified to read that whilst at school that day her daughter had been given vaccinations for Hepatitis A, influenza, meningitis and HPV even though she had given specific instructions that she did not want her child to receive any kind of medications, including vaccines whilst at school. Ms Kinney was also informed by her daughter that the school nurses had taken a sample of her blood and a sample of urine!
New American news covering the story revealed that as a result of this ‘assault’, the 14 year old had developed a rash covering her body. The report states:
A week after receiving the vaccinations, Kinney’s daughter came down with a rash that spread over her body — what her family doctor determined was an adverse reaction to one or more of the shots. She missed a week of school and her mother became concerned over potential long-term conditions because of the vaccines. 
The vaccinations were given to the teenager by nurses from St. John Providence Health System, the company that operates the school’s clinic.
Surely, this is child abuse of the highest order? If I was this child’s mother I would want answers and I would want them now. Ms Kinney is absolutely furious, speaking to news reporters she said: “How are you going to overlook something like this? You injected my child with medicine I never wanted her to have.” (my own emphasis)
True to form the school had a get out clause ready to hand:
“The staff at the clinic must maintain confidentiality with the students and the parents of the students,” the statement read. “Detroit Public Schools staff members are not informed of any services that are provided for any students and this policy is regularly communicated by the clinic staff to the school staff. All paperwork or parent permission slips are provided to students who are instructed by the clinic to return it directly to the nurse.”
Hold on a minute The school staff are not informed of any services that are provided for any students
Why the hell not!!! Does this mean that the nurses can do anything they like to the pupils just as long as they do not tell the staff about it? Does this mean that they are free to test under age children with drugs, vaccines or anything they like, just as long as they keep quiet about it? Talk about ‘See no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil!!!!!!’
It appears that not only do schools have a right to go round giving whatever vaccinations they fancy to our children; they can take their blood and urine as well. I asked Dr Rebecca Carley her opinion on the schools disgusting antics. She said:
Each child attending school has their own private medical doctor, who knows their medical history and is familiar with their health issues. So why is it that schools are “privately contracting” with medical contractors to deliver drugs to children who they have no medical history for, and no consent from the parents for “treatment”? Officials at the Detroit public schools stated in this article that they “must maintain confidentiality” and that “staff members are NOT INFORMED of any services provided for the students”. Thus they are turning over minor children for “unknown services” to “private contractors” that the parents have NOT consented to treat their children! The West Virginia nurse whose 2 young sons both developed encephalopathy of the brain and are now both permanently brain damaged was NOT given informed consent that this is a known side effect of vaccines. Since the schools get additional funding for “special needs” (i.e., vaccine induced brain damaged) children, are they promoting this practice to get more funding for the brain damaged children created by this biological assault conducted at the hands of their “private medical contractors”?
Page 9 of publication #99-6194 published by the CDC on May 4, 2000, “Vaccine Information Statements – What You Need to Know” discusses “vaccine-related illnesses, disabilities, injuries or conditions…where deaths occur”. Children are being assaulted without consent of parents with agents that can cause these vaccine-related illnesses and death.
According to West’s North Carolina General Statutes Annotated, Chapter 14, Subchapter X, Article 36B: Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction: under Section 14-288.21 (c) (1): THE TERM …”WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE, MEANS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: ANY WEAPON, DEVICE, OR METHOD THAT IS DESIGNED OR HAS THE CAPABILITY TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY THROUGH THE RELEASE, DISSEMINATION OR IMPACT OF…(B) A DISEASE ORGANISM, OR (C) TOXIC OR POISONOUS CHEMICALS OR THEIR IMMEDIATE PRECURSORS”.
Thus, according to the above definition, the true weapons of mass destruction have been located…in the needles of “private medical contractors” to whom children are turned over without their parents’ consent by school officials, in violation of the Nuremburg code, which states: “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential…without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion….“
I thought that sending a child to school was to educate them not to have them pumped full of poisons and toxins as soon as their parent’s backs are turned.
It appears not and instead of putting the occasional band aid on and checking for head lice as they did in my day, school nurses have become little more than pharmaceutical companies paid servants and that the term ‘we are only following orders’ still stands.
1. Dave Bohon – Parents Fighting Against Gov’t Vaccines Agenda http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/11104-parents-fighting-against-govt-vaccination-agenda
Photo Credit: Lau Lau Chan