Keep in mind those of you trying to inform your physicians; science is controlled by those with an agenda. To be so deliberately and vehemently ignorant of real science strongly suggests there is another higher level agenda for vaxing children at birth and with such excessive schedules; it is not only for big profits. That is the obvious conclusion they want vaccine opponents to believe. But, tragically, it goes far beyond that.

As most of you know, all ‘scientifically acceptable’ studies are performed by those who control the data. The data used in these studies is a HUGE problem. You won’t see anyone from Generation Rescue, etc., involved.

This garbage with testing mercury (Hg) levels of the blood is credible evidence of thimerosal safety only to those who don’t understand chemistry, which is probably most of these physicians, as well (certainly not by those who oversee these studies). Methyl and ethyl mercury are not detected in the blood because their added methyl and ethyl groups make them more lipid soluble. For those of you who may not understand the relevancy, it means it passes more easily into the nervous system, which is largely composed of lipids; the cerebrum is approx. 80% lipids. Therefore, mercury levels are not detected in the blood because it has already been absorbed into the nervous system and other lipid membranes of other organs. Imagine; the very mechanisms used to insulate the central nervous system are infiltrated with Hg.

If you want to keep the public and its future generation unable to think, physically burdened, and predisposed to future degenerative disease (not too far in the future these days), this is one of the best ways to accomplish this goal. This intended long-term purpose has some consequences as many parents are finding, but easily overlooked for achieving the directive. Hard to comprehend? Yes, I know.

What amazes me is research should be based on the very basic sciences these researchers were required to take to enter into medical school. I guess today’s science has evolved to such a high degree that the basic sciences are no longer necessary. Apparently, it has become like the bible; it’s old, outdated, and irrelevant for today, especially when you have an agenda to accomplish.

Here's a link to the department of justice defense team's expert testimony exhibits in the Cedillo case. They differ somewhat from the court transcripts.

I don't recall a lot of dicussion concerning them inside the community.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/autism/master%20autism..pdf

I right clicked this master pdf and the document properties states it was created 2/26/09, but the docket indicates it was posted on the date of 2/2/09.

The exhibits in the listing are hot links. Click each one to view the actual testimony.

Laboratory studies have shown that within 24 hours of injecting a minute dose of mercury into a muscle anywhere in the body (monkeys were used in the study), it would be present in the spinal cord and brain. The mercury was also present in the kidneys, lungs, bloodstream, connective tissue, and adrenal and other endocrine glands. In the brain, it tended to congregate in the hypothalamus, which regulates the sympathetic nervous system (associated with the brainstem), believed to be the organic seat of emotions.

While mercury levels slowly dissipate in a predictable amount of time from other body tissues and even from the teeth (in six weeks, its levels might be halved), mercury does not have a "half-life" in the nervous system or brain. Instead, it binds firmly to a specific chemical compound which happens to exist there in the body’s highest concentrations.

"The main devastating effect of mercury in the nervous system is that it interferes with the energy production inside each cell," says Dr. Klinghardt. "The nerve cell is impaired in its ability to detoxify itself [and excrete the mercury] and in its ability to nurture itself. The cell becomes toxic and dies, or lives in a state of chronic malnutrition. A multitude of illnesses, usually associated with neurological symptoms, result." Among these are chronic viral and fungal illnesses, recurrent episodes of bacterial infections, and chronic fatigue.

By a curious self-preservation reflex of the body, the emergence of these conditions can be viewed as a way of accommodating the heavy metal presence, speculates Dr. Klinghardt. "Most, if not all, chronic infectious diseases are not caused by a failure of the immune system, but are a conscious adaptation of the immune system to an otherwise lethal heavy metal environment."

Mercury suffocates the cells and they die, so the immune system cultivates fungi and bacteria which are able to bind large amounts of the toxic metal in their respective cell walls, thereby enabling the patient’s cells to breathe again. The downside, of course, is that the body must now feed these otherwise undesirable microbes and deal with their toxic waste. In addition, a person with mercury contamination often becomes zinc deficient and the functioning of copper and other minerals in the body will be compromised as well.

This perspective leads Dr. Klinghardt to the following strong statement: "As soon as anybody has any type of medical illness or symptom, whether medical or emotional, the amalgam fillings should be removed and the mercury residues should be eliminated from the body, especially the brain."

Ok, he is talking amalgams...but what if it's injected into your bloodstream, even worse....

Lately I have found it quite disheartening that some of my own friends and family that are newer members of the medical mainstream(doctors and nurses) are very uniformed and hostile about this issue. These are people that are supposedly close to us and used to be quite open minded. I can really tell that Pharma has a big influence on the education of medical professionals. I am quite sure that when I approach these individuals they will put on their white coats and pull their "I am an MD and you are an irrational parent" card. JB's new site will help me to combat this bs and show just who really is irrational. To be honest, 99% of the MD's wont be familiar with any of these studies and they are just trying to parrot what they were taught by AAP/Pharma in med school.

Here:

http://www.fourteenstudies.org/ranked.html

That is the link you're looking for, ranking the reports, what's wrong with them, etc.

Perhaps, like others who nay say, you should RESEARCH before you comment.