Inadequate safety studies
Medical
study ploys
[They don't do any long term studies, a few weeks at best, and all done by the (psychopathic) makers!! Then they have various ploys to make them look safer (apart from ignoring adverse reactions), such as Secrecy Study data kept secret Healthy trial babies only Never unvaccinated controls Placebos, and Third world guinea pigs Foreign studies.]
See: Healthy trial babies only Never unvaccinated controls Medical study ploys Study data kept secret Secrecy
See: DPT Mouse tests Mouse toxicity test Kendrick mouse test Hist test
[Swine flu vax 2009 Aug] Injecting one thing for testing and then adding adjuvant later
Quotes
Anyone analyzing the “vaccine safety studies” done by
vaccine makers and vaccine proponents can see that they were purposely designed
to show safety by omitting people in the study who truly reflected the
population being vaccinated and who were, by all standards of science, at risk
of harm by the vaccines.
They do studies that use as placebo controls people injected
with a vaccine adjuvant. Placebos are supposed to be completely inert. The
evidence shows that the greatest danger from vaccines is from the vaccine
adjuvant — so, how can they use adjuvant-injected people as controls? Yet, all
of their studies used such vaccinated controls — this is blatantly manipulated,
and they know it.
The studies that are quoted endlessly by these elite members
of academia and government agencies and used to close the door on the vaccine
connection to neurodevelopmental problems are purposefully designed so as to
suggest no link between vaccines and any complication.
This falsified research is protected by academia, the media,
and government agencies. Yet, they have the audacity to stand in judgment of
Wakefield. This is not to say that Wakefield should be free of scrutiny — all
researchers should be carefully scrutinized for bias.
[2011 Jan] Big Pharma
Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.
I decided that I was going to review all of the safety studies about measles
and measles containing vaccines because if I was going to get into a fight, I
needed to know what I was talking about. If I was going to challenge the status
quo and say things that might have an adverse effect on vaccine uptake, I had to
know what I was talking about. So I read all the papers and I was appalled. I
was absolutely appalled that the quality of the safety studies of the single and
combined MMR vaccine in particular and then I wrote to my colleagues in advance
of the paper coming out and I said this is going attract a lot of attention in
the media and I have to tell you, that I have now read all these studies. I have
written a 250-page report which I'm willing you, I'm
very happy for you to read and I cannot support the continued use of the MMR
vaccine. I will continue vigorously to support the use of the single vaccine but
I cannot support the use of the MMR.
Now at that stage, the dean of the
medical school Arie Zuckerman had
decided that he was going to have a press briefing, a press conference. Get
people together, tell them about the findings of the study. And, I wrote to him,
I copied this letter to him so he had an opportunity at this stage to say no
press briefing. We don't want to get into the vaccine
issue. Wakefield doesn't attend the press briefing or
if the question is raised at the press briefing, it doesn't
go to Wakefield. He had three opportunities to diffuse this, he didn't.
As soon as the question came up at the press briefing which inevitably it was
going to do, he directed it straight to me. And I responded in exactly the same
way that I said I would respond in advance of that press briefing.
Now, it wasn''t
based upon the observations in 12 children, it was based upon reading all of the
safety studies and producing a 250-page safety report on those studies which I'd
offered to my colleagues to read. And that was the basis for my recommendation
that parents be allowed to use the option of the single vaccines.[2010 April] Andrew Wakefield Interview by Dr
Mercola
Coming down to the issue of giving it (Hepatitis B vaccine) on day one of life, there are several issues that surround that. The first is when we did this primate study giving that hepatitis B vaccine on day one. We looked for the safety studies of that policy. What had been done to establish the safety of giving it on day one? Not just giving it on day one but giving it on day one to every infant whether they were born at 24 weeks or 30 weeks or 36 weeks or 40 weeks, whatever their gestational…their birth weight was, whether they were 10 lbs or 3 lbs or 2 lbs, they were getting the same shot at day one as a matter of policy. Safety studies… We couldn't find them. And that was really shocking, really shocking. How could this be? If you're going to make a case for it, if you're going to do it, your'e going to make it a matter of policy for every kid in the country then you'e got to be absolutely certain that you got the safety set that is right because if not, you may produce insidious problems, minor degrees of damage which you don't pick up straight away but are catastrophic [2010 April] Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield
"Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks. There are NO (NONE) long term (months or years) safety studies on any vaccination or immunization. For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized at to their true nature."--Dr Buttram MD
"A small but growing minority of physicians and scientists are becoming aware that safety testings for the various vaccines have been woefully inadequate. As one of many examples, in 1994, a special committee of the National Academy of Sciences published a comprehensive review of the vaccine safety of the hepatitis B vaccine. When the committee investigated 5 possible and plausible adverse effects, they were unable to come to any conclusion for 4 of them because, to their dismay, they found that relevant safety research had not been done."--Harold Buttram MD
"He said the normal trials on a new vaccine were not possible in Britain because of the relatively small numbers of people who contracted the disease. Instead scientists had tested whether the vaccine produced sufficient antibodies."--Media report on meningitis C vaccine
"To date there has never been an independent, controlled study which proves that their vaccines are safe or even effective."--Ingri Cassel
"While the myriad short-term hazards of most immunizations are known (but rarely explained), no one knows the long term consequences of injecting foreign proteins into the body of your child. Even more shocking is the fact that no one is making any structured effort to find out."--Dr Robert Mendelsohn MD
JABS has not been able to find any properly conducted trials where the safety of the vaccines has been monitored for more than a few weeks. JABS has not been able to find any studies of the long-term consequences of the use of the MMR vaccines.Why Does The MMR Vaccine Need To Be Suspended? http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/jabs/mmrsuspend.html
"The CDC immunization policy is disgraceful from a scientific, medical, or public policy point of view. It is a scientific disgrace because vaccines only get short-term or epidemiological tests, and not controlled tests for long-term side effects"--Roger Schlafly, PhD
"There is a wider problem because of the failure to carry out long-term, randomised, controlled studies — properly conducted scientific investigations which would monitor the effects of multiple, early vaccination versus non-vaccination into adulthood."--Dr Odent M.D.
"The central defect in the numerous, recent mandatory vaccination requirements is that the same people who are profiting from these vaccines are also in control of the research on[,] and publication of[,] the dangers of the vaccines. The fox is pretending to guard the henhouse. …foreign research has found problems with the Hepatitis B vaccine for children. Note that I said "foreign," because there is no independent US medical research on this. Incredibly, even industry safety studies on the MMR vaccine have not extended beyond three weeks following vaccination."---Laura Reude.
"We suspect financial ties between vaccine manufacturers and medical groups such as the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) which endorse the (hep B) vaccine," says Dr. Orient, pointing to a substantial donation to AAP from Merck & Co. "And the federal government pays the state a bonus up to $100 for every "fully" vaccinated child. What’s their motive -- money or medicine?" Jane Orient M.D.
"I have minutes from a CDC Study Group Meeting on the Hepatitis B vaccine held in March, 1997. The minutes of the meeting show that it would take at least a 60 day study to show the onset of MS. Clinical studies done by the two manufacturers were four and five days in length, respectively. It should be noted that the afternoon session of this meeting was chaired by Dr. Robert Sharrar of Merck. This group was to decide how to identify various types of adverse reactions such as MS and demylenating disease and to plan meaningful studies. When Dr. Sharrar appeared on ABC's 20/20 in January he said that he honestly believed that the Hepatitis B vaccine had not caused any problems. Can an employee of a pharmaceutical company that manufactures the vaccine be objective in designing experiments to show fault in a product that generates close to a billion dollars in sales for his company?"---Betty Fluck
ABC NEWS Commentary On Vaccine Debate Written by Nicholas Regush
From Pediatric News:
Don't Be First or Last to Use a Drug or Vaccine---Mike Bykowski, Senior Writer
[Pediatric News 33(7):13, 1999. International Medical News Group] Hilton Head, S.C.
Don't be the first or the last in your community to use a new drug or
vaccine, Dr. Jerome O. Klein advised at a meeting on clinical pediatrics sponsored by
Boston Medical Center.
When a new drug comes on the market, it's typically based on
5,000-10,000 subjects who have received it because that's all you need for FDA approval,
said Dr. Klein, director of pediatric infectious diseases at Boston Medical Center.
If there's an adverse event with an incidence of 1 in 20,000 associated
with the drug or vaccine, it won't be detected right away. Unless the new drug or vaccine
fills a critical void, Dr. Klein recommended staying away from it until the first 100,000
individuals have been treated. After that "you can feel a lot more comfortable that
the adverse event profile is as it has been
described."
Michael Belkin on "science based" vaccine information
[Home]