Fathering
Child Health

[Most crime is committed by fatherless children, which is why the Luciferians attack the family, mostly by removing the father.  It is no accident that New Labour made benefits more for single parents.]

Judge Andrew Becroft: "Thirty-seven out of the last forty-one offenders I have dealt with [90%] claim to have no meaningful relationship with their fathers ..." July/August 1998.---- Greg Hallett p.25

See: Family Courts   Feminism  Femininity and Masculinity   Marriage

[2013 Feb] Conspiracy of silence on value of marriage: Politicians frightened to admit fathers are vital, says top family lawyer

[2013 Jan] Families need fathers, claims study

[2011] The Importance of Fathers by Mark Gungor

[2000] The Importance of Fathers-in-Families by Bob Simcock

Book
Are You My Father? The Family Court and Other Experiments  by Greg Hallett.

Quotes
The
Family Court is basically a crime creation movement because 90% of crime in New Zealand is created by fatherless kids, so the Judiciary is a crime creation movement and the District Court used to fund the Family Court and 90% of the criminals who go through the District Court don't have a father, so the Courts are a crime creation movement. Greg Hallett Begins 2/12: Interview with Dr. James Fetzer PhD  Hallett, Greg

They are 5 times more likely to commit suicide as children; they are 20 times more likely to have behavioural disorders; they are 32 times more likely to run away and so on. Daughters of single parents are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 92% more likely to dissolve their own marriages, and are 164% more likely to have premarital births. [2000] The Importance of Fathers-in-Families by Bob Simcock

"There's something like a line of gold running through a man's words when he talks to his daughter and gradually, over the years it gets to be long enough for you to pick up and weave into a cloth that feels like love itself."---John Gregory Brown

ON ASSASSINS: “What my husband does for a living is train mercenaries — young boys from countries like Romania, Dominican Republic, Haiti. They’re training them to be murderers, and the taxpayers’ dollars are paying for this. They psychologically profile them. The profile is similar to my husband’s and Lee Harvey Oswald’s and [Timothy] McVeigh’s, and others who were all part of this program. Jeffrey Dahmer was part of this program. They’re all Army. They were all picked out because they were perverted or twisted. [The military profiles for] strong mother, weak father, no father, poor. Because these guys are looking for security, so they will stay in the military and do anything for that security.” (Interviews, Disk 1) Griggs, Kay

[2009] The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt By Timothy Matthews
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars The man of the household must be housebroken to ensure that junior will grow up with the right social training and attitudes. The advertising media, etc., are engaged to see to it that father-to-be is pussy-whipped before or by the time he is married. He is taught that he either conforms to the social notch cut out for him or his sex life will be hobbled and his tender companionship will be zero. He is made to see that women demand security more than logical, principled, or honorable behavior. By the time his son must go to war, father (with jelly for a backbone) will slam a gun into junior's hand before father will risk the censure of his peers, or make a hypocrite of himself by crossing the investment he has in his own personal opinion or self-esteem. Junior will go to war or father will be embarrassed. So junior will go to war, the true purpose not withstanding.