Looking where it ain't
[back] Medical Mind Control  [back] Medical study ploys

[One classic is the way the industry are only doing MMR autism epidemiology studies (See: Government/industry), which they can easily fiddle, instead of actually studying the children.  While the drug and charity industry keep looking for drugs to cure symptoms, a gravy train that will run forever, they hope.  Another is Autism and genetic studies over the truth--environmental/vaccines.]

Government/industry MMR studies
Mercury levels
Autism and genetic

Autism Speaks Spends $27.4 Million on Genetics Studies since '06

[2012 Oct] Vaccine Research Conflicts of Interest: Vaxxed & Unvaxxed Kids Not Compared  The elephant in the vaccine research room is the comparison of health between vaxxed and unvaxxed people. That research simply isnít being done, in spite of being the obvious way to determine whether vaccines are safe or lead to better health.  Thereís one near-sure way to avoid finding something, and thatís not to look for it. The lack of research that could end the question of whether vaccines are safe simply isnít being done. The reason is obvious: Those who could do it wonít because it would conflict with their careers and financial status.

[2012 Feb] Scientists with Starving Brains By J.B. Handley  scientists and the press, continue to publish and report on useless studies that insult the intelligence of integrity of both parents and well-meaning professionals alike.

BOYD HALEY comments: IOM To Hold Workshop on Autism (& not vaccines)
This is the old ploy of "looking were it ain't" if you don't want to find something.  I have encouraged parents of autistic children in the USA to get urinary porphyrin profiles done to determine if their child shows signs of mercury toxicity.  It is almost 100% that these children, at least those that have reported back to me, are moderate to extremely mercury toxic with regards to this clinical testing procedure.  Just where would children less than 7 years of age obtain enough mercury to inhibit their porphyrin pathways?  So the IOM suggests looking everywhere except where the most logical place would be, in the vaccines given to these children that contained thimerosal.  The IOM ought to be ashamed of itself, if not for doing something scientifically dishonest,  then for being so inept as to think vaccine exclusion from consideration of exclusion for autism causation would be accepted by the American public.  Most importantly, while they are looking everywhere else these children lose time before an acceptable treatment for mercury toxicity can be developed---and at least a significant number of autistic children are definitely mercury toxic.  Boyd Haley

[May 2007] The mercury, autism debacle: How stupid do they think we are? by Michael Wagnitz 
If one was really interested in determining the body burden of mercury they would perform the urinary porphyrin profile analysis (UPPA). Porphyrins are precursors to heme, the oxygen carrying component of blood. Mercury inhibits the conversion of specific porphyrins to heme. This test is backed by decades of published research. Recently it was shown in two published, peer-reviewed studies, that mercury inhibited porphyrins were significantly higher in autistic patients when compared to age matched controls (1)(2). The other way to test for mercury in the body is by using a provoking agent and measuring mercury in the urine. ...... Dr. Fombonne refers to the amount of mercury in vaccines as "trace". Again, if he were a toxicologist or chemist, he would realize that the concentration of mercury in a multi-dose vaccine vial is 250 times higher than what the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies as hazardous waste.

I discuss the British findings, briefly, in Chapter Twelve, pg 250. A highly regarded British laboratory, Scientific Analyses Ltd. (SAL Ltd.) in Manchester, tested samples of British-made anthrax vaccine for the Granada Television network and found a thirty-six parts per billion concentration of squalene in two lots of the British vaccine. That is a fairly close match for the concentration found in one of the five lots confirmed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to contain squalene. Lot #FAV 043, according to the FDA, contained forty parts per billion. What is also noteworthy is the specific test used by SAL Ltd. to detect squalene in anthrax vaccine: flame ionization/gas chromatography. This is the same test used by the FDA. Interestingly, a laboratory the U.S. Army sub-contracted to test the vaccine, SRI, used a much less sensitive analysis called liquid chromatography, which would have been incapable of finding squalene in the concentrations present in either the U.S. or British anthrax vaccines. SRI has a long business association with the Department of Defense and an unanswered question is whether SRI deliberately chose to use a test that would invariably fail to find low concentrations squalene in the vaccine and thus allow the U.S. Department of Defense to declare its anthrax vaccine squalene-free, which it did. Gary Matsumoto http://www.vaccine-a.com/forum.html