The Mammography
racket
[back] Cancer
[back] Medical Hoaxes
[back] Radiation
[The only reason for this hoax is to increase cancer
levels, make more money by funnelling in victims to
Allopathy Inc, and its seen to be doing
something propaganda value. See:
Depleted Uranium
to see the Beast behind mammograms.]
See: Radiation
Radiation therapy
Scans
Zapper quotes
Breast
thermography
Quotes
Articles
[2011 Oct] Women endangered
by high rate of false-positive mammograms
[2011 July] Widely used CAD
mammography tool fails to find invasive breast cancer, causes needless tests and
stress "In real-world practice, CAD increases
the chances of being unnecessarily called back for further testing because of
false-positive results without clear benefits to women,” said Joshua Fenton,
assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Family and Community Medicine.
“Breast cancers were detected at a similar stage and size regardless of whether
or not radiologists used CAD."
[2011 June] The FDA assaults
breast thermography while protecting mammography industry First of
all, it slanders the breast thermography industry and the multitude of
mainstream medical journal articles supporting its value. As a point of
interest, the FDA approved breast thermography as an adjunct to mammography in
1982. You would think that there just might be a reason or two supporting its
value that they appreciate but fail to mention....There is an abundance of
scientific evidence in the mainstream journals supporting that breast
thermography as a superior tool to mammograms because it is more sensitive and
makes fewer errors when used properly, particularly in women under the age of
50, where there's tremendous controversy about the validity of mammograms as a
primary screening tool for breast cancer. The final embarrassment for the
FDA and Journal Watch, is that three of the five people voting against bringing
breast thermography forward into clinical practice in that fatal meeting in
2004, had a serious conflict of interest connecting them to the mammography
industry. Wow!
[2010 March] Mammograms
cause 7,000 women to receive false positives each year in the UK
[2010] Mammogram Scam for
Oldsters with Money by SHERRY BAKER (NATURAL NEWS)
[2009 Nov] Risks of Mammography: Hidden
Role of the American Cancer Society
[Newstarget Feb 2007] Mammograms offer no health
benefits whatsoever, doctors conclude
[2009 July] Cancer Screening: Does It
Really Save Lives? by Dr. Julian Whitaker
Mammograms by Dr Campbell
[2007] The mammogram
scam by Marnie Ko
Mammography Is Dangerous Besides Ineffective, Warns Samuel S
Epstein, M.D.
The Depths of Deceit Mammography
by Chris Gupta
The Depths of Deceit Mammography
by Barry Lynes
The "Pink" Fraud - Brought
to you by the people who make Breast Cancer by Dr.
Loretta Lanphier, ND, CN, HHP
DO MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE BREAST CANCER? By Dr. James
Howenstine, MD.
Mammograms, X-rays may boost breast cancer risk by 250%
Mammograms and breast implants
Books:
.
Preventing Breast Cancer, The story of a Major, Proven, Preventable Cause of
This Disease by Dr Gofman, M.D., Ph.D.
This book uncovers the major cause of the recent breast-cancer incidence
in the USA. The author shows that past exposure to ionizing radiation ---
primarily medical x-rays --- is responsible for about 75 percent of the
breast-cancer problem in the United States
Radiation-Induced Cancer
From Low-Dose Exposure -- An Independent Analysis, by John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.
D., 1990
Radiation from Medical
Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease:
Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population, by John W. Gofman,
M.D., Ph. D., Edited by Egan O'Connor, (1999, 699 pages)
Hypothesis-1: Medical radiation is a highly important cause (probably the
principal cause) of cancer mortality in the United States during the Twentieth
Century. Medical radiation means, primarily, exposure by xrays (including
fluoroscopy and CT scans).
Hypothesis-2: Medical radiation, received even at very low and moderate doses,
is an important cause of death from Ischemic Heart Disease; the probable
mechanism is radiation-induction of mutations in the coronary arteries,
resulting in dysfunctional clones (mini-tumors) of smooth muscle cells.
