The Smearing of Dr Wakefield
Dr. Andy Wakefield  MMR vaccines

[This is propaganda ploy Word Game or ad Hominem. Comes through hack Brain Deer of the Sunday Times, flag piece of the UK Corporate media (last investigation into childhood vaccines was in a provincial US paper in 1984).  Stunning hypocrisy just for starters (all of their MMR spokespeople receive money from Merck, the MMR maker, and one has a patent on Rotavirus vaccine).  See these quotes.]

[2010 Jan] Read Silenced Witnesses Volume II: The Parents' Story and you will know MMR causes autism and serious bowel disease, while the governments have been lying through their teeth (as usual), supported by the media Greek Chorus

‘My husband has been persecuted by extremely powerful forces for asking questions that his research findings made it morally and ethically essential for him to ask,’.......... ‘I used to believe that this country was a bastion of academic integrity and intellectual freedom. So this whole sad process of attrition, isolation and vilification, on a very personal level, has sickened and disillusioned me. [Media Oct 2006 Wakefield] VILIFED by the MMR zealots

See: Times group  Brian Deer

[2011 Jan] Big Pharma Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.

GMC Hearing
Wakefield GMC Hearing 2007

[2011 Nov] Journalist Brian Deer Drops BMJ Editor Dr Fiona Godlee Head First in Brown Stuff Over Wakefield Fraud Allegations

[2011 Aug] The Full Monty: a Review of Brian Deer and British Medical Journal’s Competing Interests in the Wakefield Affair By John Stone

[pdf 2011 Jan] DR. ANDREW WAKEFIELD WAS RIGHT. BRIAN DEER IS THE LIAR. THERE WAS NO FRAUD. NO HOAX. HERE’S PROOF.

[2011 Jan] Documents emerge proving Dr Andrew Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Brian Deer caught misrepresenting the facts

Sunday Times’ London Editor Must Quit Over False “Wakefield MMR Data Fixing” Story

[2009 Feb] A deer in the headlights By Melanie Phillips

Sunday Times Journalist Instigated GMC Case Against Dr Andrew Wakefield
Sunday Times' Journalist Made Up Wakefield MMR Data Fixing Allegation

[Stop Press 9/Feb/09 -Wakefield Responds to Sunday Times' False Allegations]

Sunday Times - Sinks To New Low With Yet More MMR Junk Journalism

Dr Andrew Wakefield Demolishes Ignorant US Vaccine Lobby

"Prof Denis McDevitt,.....attended meetings that discussed warnings from other countries about an early form of the triple jab, using the Urabe strain of mumps virus, which caused encephalitis and meningitis. Despite warnings and the fact that this vaccine had already been withdrawn in Canada, the Urabe-containing jab was introduced in the UK in 1988.  Some of the 12 children whose medical history featured in the controversial 1998 Lancet paper, drawn up by Dr Wakefield and his colleagues and which suggested a possible link between the jab and bowel disease and regressive autism, had received the Urabe-strain vaccine - as indeed had some of those children in the high court litigation with manufacturers." [June 2007 Private Eye] MMR Conflict of Interest Zone

[2008 Oct] Dr Andrew Wakefield On MMR Vaccine In Sunday Express

[June 2007 Private Eye] MMR Conflict of Interest Zone
[May 2007] MMR judge faces probe over brother's link to vaccine firm
[May 2007] GMC Challenged On MMR Inquiry Chief's Vaccine Firm Links
[May 2007] MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND LANCET BOSS

 

[JABS Jan 2007] Brian Deer: Questions for the Sunday Times --John Stone

[JABS Dec 2006 Wakefield persecution] The latest from Deer re Wakefield expert fees

[Dec 2006] Response by Dr Andy Wakefield to enquiries about expert fees.

[Media Oct 2006 Wakefield] VILIFED by the MMR zealots

[JABS Press Release 10 July 2006] BBC withdraws allegation that Dr Andrew Wakefield was paid to conduct MMR investigation

Wakefield was not paid to investigate damage---John Stone

MMR - SCIENCE AND FICTION": the Richard Horton story 25 September 2004 ------John Stone 

[NVIC June 12, 2006] UK Docs Attack Wakefield
From the moment Andy Wakefield stood his ground and said "I will not live my life in fear" and then went on to talk with me about how important it was to stand up for the truth even though you risk your life to do it, I knew he was an extraordinary individual. I knew he would make history but pay a terrible price for it.
   During the past 25 years of work to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defend the informed consent ethic, I have seen doctors who tell the truth about vaccine risks be viciously attacked by their colleagues in government, industry and academia. The attacks are both professional and personal and, with surgical precision, the goal is to evisicerate rather than simply stun the victim. It is an ugly process and it has a distinctly Spanish Inquisition flavor to it.
  Undaunted, Dr. Wakefield has continued to conduct his humanitarian research into the biological mechanisms for MMR vaccine induced neuroimmune dysfunction. Finally, after nearly a decade of persecution for conducting scientific research that questions the scientific and moral integrity of one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies, Andy Wakefield's accusers are taking him to their own Medical Court. In a final attempt to silence him, they want to take away his medical license and his ability to care for vaccine injured children.
   The BBC in London said the General Medical Council is charging Dr. Wakefield with carrying out "inadequately founded" research, failing to obtain ethical committee approval before publishing, acquiring funding improperly and subjecting children to 'unnecessary and invasive investigations.'
     A leading London newspaper, The Daily Mail, protested Dr. Wakefield's treatment by the General Medical Council, saying "He had a duty to speak out and now he is being made to suffer for it. His treatment by the GMC is utterly unjust. If this preposterous body had existed 200 years ago, defending the prevailing wisdom against new ideas, doctors would still be treating illnesses by slitting their patients' veins."
   F.E. Yazbak, M.D., FAAP, a pediatrician and researcher of autoimmune regressive autism and vaccine injury, has published an excellent analysis of the scientific issues and political motives involved in Wakefield's persecution at the hands of the medical hierarcrhy. Dr. Yazbak's article "When Finding Nothing Is Wonderful" was first published on RedFlags on June 9, 2006. http://www.redflagsdaily.com/yazbak/2006_jun09?from=0

[Times June 2006] Focus: How a spurious health scare brought an old killer back ---Brian Deer

MORE TOSH IN WAKEFIELD WITCHHUNT---Clifford G. Miller

[Media, Private Eye, Nov 2004]  MMR: OH DEER OH DEER

[Nov 2004] Issues Raised by the Sunday Times and the Channel 4 Dispatches Programme: A statement by Dr Andrew Wakefield

[Media Noc 2004] MMR scare doctor planned rival vaccine---Brian Deer
[Letter BMJ 25 September 2004] MMR - SCIENCE AND FICTION": the Richard Horton story 
MMR AND DR WAKEFIELD:  Anyone spotted the hypocrisy?
[Media 27 February 2004] MMR scientist did not hide link with legal case, letter reveals
FURTHER STATEMENT by A WAKEFIELD [NVIC] The Smearing Of Andrew Wakefield
[Feb 2004 AVN press release] Wakefield learns that honesty is not necessarily the best policy in medicine
[Media 23 February 2004] The smearing of Andrew Wakefield
[Feb 2004] Statement from Dr Andrew Wakefield


From Paul Shattock, "I was at the ASA conference in Indianapolis a months back. Brian Deer and a camera crew turned up. They booked under their own name. I was the warm up act and, when I had finished, I went to the back of the room to talk to parents. Then Andy was on and was as excellent as usual. As he got off the stage, he was surrounded by mothers asking questions. Deer and his crew pushed them aside, turned on their recording equipment and attempted to conduct an interview. (Clearly there was no permission or request  to film.) Andy did that thing where you put your hand over the camera lens and attempted to leave the room fast. He bent down to pick up his computer and knocked against the cameraman. Deer interprets this as an attack. Deer's interpretation is that his polite request for an interview was turned down. No doubt edited highlights of this event will be shown." ----Paul Shattock