Fear mongering Lies [back] Viral mania [back] Infectious scares Measles vaccine racket
See: Viral mania Infectious scares Pandemic definition Measles Scare, 2013 UK
[2010 June] Swine Flu School Epidemics: Air Toxicology by Jim West
 Swine Flu & Fake Epidemics: Medicalisation and the Push for Global Management By JON RAPPOPORT
[2010 Jan] When did WHO change the definition of pandemic? If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word "pandemic" in order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even bigger profits, and WHO does too, what else are they lying about?
[2009 Dec] "THIS "PANDEMIC" IS ONE OF THE GREATEST MEDICAL SCANDALS OF THE CENTURY" Wolfgang Wodarg Interview for the danish "Information". Topic: False Pandemic Wolfgang Wodarg also finds it suspicious that WHO changed it’s definition of a pandemic on it’s homepage at the end of May this year: "From June 2009 it is no longer necessary, that "an enormous amount of people have contracted the illness or died” - there simply have to be a virus, spreading beyond borders, and one that people have no immunity towards,” he says.
[2009 Nov] A Nun speaks out on the H1N1
Pandemic: "The WHO changed the official definition of a pandemic" Interview with
Sister Dr. Teresa Forcades . An articulate and authoritative statement by Gaspar
Hernández Last May, WHO changed the official definition of a pandemic
-- it changed from a logical definition (a pandemic is an infection of global
proportions and with a high mortality) to an illogical definition (a pandemic is
an infection of global proportions). Under the new definition of
"pandemic", the annual [seasonal] flu more than meets the requirements to be
one. Are we going to declare a world health alert every fall? Besides absurdity
from the scientific standpoint, this has serious financial and policy
.....In 2007, WHO adopted a regulation that in case of a pandemic, WHO can legally bind member countries to vaccinate all or part of their population. The governments of these countries would be obliged then to impose fines or other penalties for individuals who refuse to be vaccinated.
Dr. Buchwald MD
"I have lectured all over the world... I have always had a special interest in newspapers. All of them have one thing in common, there is always some reference made to some epidemic in some part of the world. For instance, two years ago, one paper referred to a polio epidemic in Holland. For the past three years, our newspapers have commented on the diphtheria epidemic in Russia. By these means, the population is constantly threatened with epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always conclude: "Go and get vaccinated".--Dr Buchwald MD
"Dr. med Martin Hirte writes on page 20 of his book 'Vaccination--Pro and Contra': "To create fear among parents to strengthen their motivation to vaccinate is an important part of the publicity used to promote vaccinations. A whole branch of research is examining the question: 'What level of fear needs to be created to appear as convincing as possible?'"---Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite "Protective" Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p104)
"Yet our medically controlled Health Boards cook up fake epidemics, create panics for profit, such as the ones in Kansas City in 1921, Pittsburgh in 1924, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington in 1925. An effort was also made to create a panic in New York in 1925, but due to the open fight against it by the New York Evening Graphic, the Commissioner of Health called it off."--Herbert Shelton DC
"Since people cannot be vaccinated against their
will. the biggest job of a health department has always been, and always will
be, to persuade the unprotected people to get vaccinated.
This we attempted to do in three ways: first by education; second, by
fright; and third, by pressure.
We dislike very much to mention fright and pressure, yet they accomplish more than education, because they work faster than education, which is normally a slow process.
During the months of March and April we tried education, and vaccinated only 62,000. During May we made use of fright and pressure, and vaccinated 223,000 people.
Our educational program consisted of warnings in the daily papers, small-pox posters on the streets, in stores and factories, special small-pox bulletins for all large places of employment, and special letters to all large employers from the health department and the association of commerce, calling their attention to a threatening small-pox epidemic. The radio was also made use of in this work.
As the conditions grew worse, we felt justified in using stronger measures. We had some good pictures taken of patients suffering from the confluent type of small-pox, and had posters, showing these pictures, distributed all over the city. The moving picture theatres cooperated at this time by issuing warnings on the screen.
The newspapers published daily the names and addresses of people dying from small-pox. A second letter was sent to all factories, stores, and other places of business, informing them of a rapidly approaching small-pox epidemic, and advising them to have their employees vaccinated immediately, and thereby prevent a serious financial loss to the city, which might occur if a real epidemic developed.
At this time the department was vaccinating thousands of people daily, but there were still too many who could neither be educated nor frightened into vaccination. Cases and deaths each amounted to a considerable number, and we now felt justified in using all of the power a health officer has, and if that was not enough, to get more.
We sent out a third letter to all employers requesting them to have all of their employees vaccinated and at the same time informing them that if a small-pox case developed in their place of employment in the future we would consider their place of business a menace to the health of the community and very likely place the entire establishment under quarantine until it could be cleaned up and made safe for the public. Putting this responsibility on the employer drove in thousands of anti-vaccinationist
[2010 Sept] Pertussis epidemic? Or Media induced malady? by
Hilary Butler Being an information junkie, I have a huge
collection of newspaper articles about kids with pertussis dating from the late
70's, and... most of them are vaccinated children. One more recent prominent
one was a 10 month, fully vaccinated daughter of a doctor at Middlemore
hospital. Which reminds me of this
medical article in which in 1979, while defending his article the author
replied with a situation which exactly mimics THIS country:
I did discover that the only seriously ill infants were too young to
have been vaccinated in any case; and that these
children were threatened by an outbreak of which the onset and initial spread
were entirely among immunised
Nothing has changed in the world of expedient misinformation. Whooping cough is primarily spread by vaccinated children with undiagnosed infections, to their unvaccinated siblings, or other children in daycare or school.
The brown coloured paragraph (By 1976, the number of cases nationwide had dropped to 1,010 a year, because of what experts say was the widespread use of the vaccine. But the numbers have increased tenfold since. In California alone, there have been more than 4,000 cases reported this year, including nine infants who’ve died – most of them after being misdiagnosed initially) is typical misinformation, when the truth is, that because of "observer bias" and the assumption that all vaccinated children can never get pertussis, pertussis was constantly diagnosed as something else, until the truth gradually dawned on everyone, and that TRUTH then permeated the medical literature. Ironically, the guru of pertussis, Dr James Cherry, was the first to twig that the problem was blinkered doctors, not absence of pertussis!
Why did that truth gradually permeate the medical literature? The whole truth and nothing but, is never told in the medical literature about anything......In order to convince the public that pertussis boosters from cradle to grave is a good idea, you have to have time to concoct some plausible sounding excuses. As well as allow enough time to pass, to get away with absolute porkies.
But the mainstream media will never wake up to the fact that media induced maladies exist, because they ASSUME that doctors tell the truth, and they can't be bothered studying the medical literature (or wimp out by saying they don't have the time).
Even if they did all the above, I wonder who would in mainstream media would have the balls to challenge people like Dr Alison Roberts, and demand truth and accountability?
On past experience, the answer would be "none".