Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

Jim Stone - Fear Obscures Fukushima False Flag

April 23, 2012

http://www.henrymakow.com/jim_stone_-_fukushima_is_not_f.html


You are hearing an enormous amount of lies  because the high resolution photos totally blew it for the perpetrators.


"I will directly state to Rense and David Icke, you are information scammers. BOTH of you either linked or plagiarized my site, YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, and for whatever reasons you have been made to sit there and lie about what is going on out there at Fukushima. Your failure to report the truth will only serve to allow the "elite" to bring a similar 911-type disaster to some other victim nation, and justice would have it be yours."

--Jim Stone

Hi Henry,

I saw this article that says Fukushima is falling apart and America has been irradiated.

Do you think this is just scare-mongering to get us all in a panic? Your thoughts would be much appreciated. This whole business is very stressful.

Thank you,
Charles


Jim Stone replies:  Yes, it is Fear Mongering 

You are hearing an enormous amount of lies coming out of Japan right now because those who perpetrated the crime know they have been exposed and that the high resolution photos totally blew it for them.  They were NOT supposed to be released.

The explosion at #4 was caused by explosives, just like the WTC.  Reactor 4 is building 7.

In the classified photos, you can look straight down the throat of the empty reactor, you can see the dome sitting in the service area, and you can clearly see that the service attachment the crane hooks onto, which will NOT be on the dome when the reactor is in operation, is ON THE DOME.  Furthermore, in other not classified photos that are captures from live drone video feed, you can clearly see reactor 4's dome is in perfect shape, with the bolts removed and hanging, as they would be during normal service.

It is highly unlikely that reactor 4's containment is in a condition that would cause it to collapse, and if the reactor itself is going to fall over it's meaningless, it's just a shell with no core in it.  If the structure itself fell over, it would not contribute to the disaster significantly, because the fuel rods will fall in solid pieces, and at #3 the explosion totally blew a real functioning core out of the reactor, and also blew the fuel pools away, while atomizing them to dust - the worst possible scenario. 

All this hoopla about #4 is to cover what happened at #3.  The worst possible disaster has already happened, which I reported a year ago and the classified photos PROVE IT.

Don't let new lies cover up an old truth, Fukushima was sabotaged and destroyed with nuclear weapons, it's especially obvious at #4, where evidence remains and was not totally blown away like it was at #3.  These were low output nukes in the single digit kiloton range,

Here are the photos that prove everything I have said here; please ask detractors to present similar evidence DIRECTLY FROM THE SCENE rather than pretty hand drawn graphics and animations;

This photo clearly shows reactor 3 and its fuel pools are GONE.

This photo clearly shows reactor 4 was dis-assembled and DID NOT explode by itself, explosives HAD TO have been brought in.

And if that is not enough, This photo ought to make it obvious #4 really was dis-assembled.

And for those readers who may think I am just some idiot, with no credibility, I present this screen capture, which I would like Rense and Icke to try to get these guys to post for them as well if they are so damn smart: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/800fit.jpg

And, I will directly state to Rense and David Icke, you are information scammers, BOTH of you either linked or plagiarized my site, YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, and for whatever reasons you have been made to sit there and lie about what is going on out there at Fukushima. Your failure to report the truth will only serve to allow the "elite" to bring a similar 911 type disaster to some other victim nation, and justice would have it be yours.

That is, of course, if my site and those who linked prove to not be enough to stop them.

Jim Stone Freelancer - Whole Reply Here