Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (read pharmaceutical vested interests1)
[back] Medical Industry

[The Allopath/vaccinator run rubber stamp that funds the vaccine companies with taxpayers money, and protects them from litigation.  If you think the Corporations don't run the government (aka Fascism) then the gov vaccine committees will shed that illusion.  A classic was the Smallpox Heist 2002  where these pharma bandits extracted millions from the taxpayers for a threat they invented, for a vaccine they will never use.  They created a 'sub-committee' so they can hide the fact they are all either vaccine company employees or that compromised it makes no difference.  They even refused to release the names of the members in this instance.  No surprise there.  Recently shown to have concealed information of unsafe vaccines for 30 years, and they put MMR Urabe on the UK market after it was withdrawn in Canada!!  These Corporate criminals want prosecuting for the countless child deaths and injuries they have caused and locked up, for decades.
     In the USA they have two vaccine committees,
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) & ACIP: The Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices  where they dish out 'waivers' to vaccine company people.  One committee was even chaired by a Merck man. See: Betty D. Fluck
     This pharma fox has been running the Government vaccine hen house for 200 years.
     A well established member was Sir Roy Meadow  who created
Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy that is used to hide many vaccine deaths.  Recent crime is pushing mercury containing flu vax for pregnancy (1).
    All members will be Allopaths or in Allopathy Inc.
These phrases give a clue: 'Head of Vaccinology', 'Product development Group aerosol measles vaccine,' 'Advisory board meetings on varicella and zoster vaccines', 'Bursary and Travel Expenses in (April 2008 (GSK) and May 2008 (Sanofi Pasteur MSD)) for lecturing specific to HPV vaccine,' 'Financial Support for immunisation study days at the PCT (Sanofi Pasteur MSD and GSK)', 'Local co-investigator in RSV vaccine study funded by MedImmune,' 'Immunisation Co-ordinator', 'Head of Vaccinology', 'Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme', 'Consultant Paediatrician, 'Community Paediatrician' (they dish out vaccines) July 2009.  I.e. with a professional/pecuniary interest, then some will get funding from vaccine companies, eg Miller.
   
 Current rules state that you only have to declare your interests if they are less than 12 months old.  If you did any dealings with a company prior to that, you don’t even have to mention it.]

Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 8UG

See: Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM)  ACIP Conflict of interest    Sir Roy Meadow UK Medicines Control Agency (MCA) Vaccine Conflict of Interest quotes


Dr. Andy Wakefield 
MMR Urabe

Members (past also)
Emond, Alan
Brent Taylor
Conway
Hall, Andrew
HULL, DAVID
Kroll, Professor
Langman, Professor Michael
McDevitt
Meadow, Roy
Miller, Elizabeth
Parry, Vivienne
Pollard, Andrew
Salisbury, David
Rotblat, Dr F

Professor George Nuki

JOINT SUB-COMMITTEE ON ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINES AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PRODUCTS

[2009 June pdf] JOINT COMMITTEE ON VACCINATION AND IMMUNISATION DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MEETING

[17 Sept 1990 Salisbury, McDevitt Meadow, Miller   Rotblat

Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes1986-1992

[6 Oct 1989]  Salisbury, Meadow, Miller  Rotblat

[8 March 1988] [copy 2] Salisbury, McDevitt, HULL, Meadow, Miller, Rotblat

[6 Feb 1987 Salisbury,   Miller, 
[6 July 1987  CSM-JCVI AND ARVI 6-July-87]    Salisbury, Meadow, Miller
[2 Oct 1987 
CSM/JCVI 2 Oct 1987]    Salisbury,  Meadow, Miller

[7 Feb 1986]    HULL, Miller, 
[6 June 1986]   HULL, Miller,
[3 Oct 1986]    HULL, Miller,

Articles
[2014 March] Dangers Associated With Vaccinations Have Been Withheld From Public For 30 Years. Here Are The Documents

[2011 pdf] The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds? by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD   Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and  the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

[2012 Aug] At Last! Government Documents Locked Up for 30 Years Proving This Vaccine Unsafe Finally Revealed by Christina England  Secret government documents that have been under lock and key for thirty years have revealed that the UK government has known for many years that the single measles vaccine can cause the debilitating neurological disorder SSPE or Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis.

[2012 Aug] 30 years of secret, official transcripts prove vaccine schedules in US and UK are based on government lies  “[T]he JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe, adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity,’ a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence,”  “Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”...The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI).

[2012 March] 30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids  the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics

[2011 May] UK Paediatrician and MSBP Expert Knew Babies Suffered Breathing Problems and Died After Vaccination By Christina England

[2010 April. Video] Dr Andrew Wakefield - In His own words

[2009 July] Conflicted Government Expert Airbrushes Embarrassing Autism Science 

Demonstration against the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) on 3rd October 2009 outside the Houses of Parliament.

[2009 May] UK Compulsory Vaccination Imminent By John Stone

UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination

[pdf 2009 march] The Urabe Farrago. A Recent Historical Example of Corporations and Governments Hiding Vaccine Damage for the Greater Good by Martin J Walker MA

[2009 March] From the UK: The Betrayal of a Nation's Children By Martin Walker In two weeks time, in April of this year, vaccination policy in Britain will change radically when it is handed over to a committee appointed by a quango that consists almost entirely of drug company insiders......So powerful is Big Pharma in little Britain, that there has never been a single successful court action against a pharmaceutical company; that all British Vioxx and MMR claimants were denied legal aid; for two years now, Dr Andrew Wakefield and two other doctors have been on trial before the General Medical Council, for suggesting that MMR might cause inflammatory bowel disease and Autistic Spectrum Disorders; and as 1,340 adverse reactions are announced following the Cervarix mass vaccination, ongoing for six months, the drug company-funded regulators have told the British people, that they can live with these minor events.

[2009 march] JAB MAKERS LINKED TO VACCINE PROGRAMME 

UK’s GMC, Dr Jayne Donegan’s Story, Vaccines & MMR Here is the shocking story of how Dr Jayne Donegan was victimised by but won against the UK  General Medical Council and members of the UKs Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and all for giving accurate and truthful evidence in Court about vaccines and their hazards.

[2009 Jan pdf] To Encourage the Others by Martin J Walker MA  [See: MMR death (George Fisher)]

[July 2007 Gardasil] The Express Newspaper - Health Reporting Malfeasance Exposed

Quotes
[2009 July] Conflicted Government Expert Airbrushes Embarrassing Autism Science 
Professor Alan Emond author of a new study claiming to overturn the link between autism and bowel disease has failed to disclose his conflict of interest as member of the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation [JCVI Members]. A 1998 Lancet medical journal study first published the link and controversially suggested a possible cause might be the MMR vaccine: [Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children Lancet 1998:351;9103]. The JCVI decides UK MMR and other vaccination policy and was recently given sole legal power by the New Labour Government: [UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination].
    In 2006 after infant Georgie Fisher died following MMR vaccination the infant’s father claims Professor Emond did not disclose JCVI membership to him and his wife when Emond was brought into the investigation by the coroner: [Georgie Boy MMR].  The Coroner subsequently discounted MMR as implicated in the death.
    In 1988 the JCVI approved  defective MMR vaccines and failed to  call for withdrawal when large numbers of British children were  seriously injured [British Government’s Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety].
    The 1998 Lancet study raising the link with autism and bowel disease has proven robust in a series of papers [cited below] despite being widely attacked in the media for suggesting a link with MMR vaccine and claimed to be “discredited”.

The chairman of the government committee that approved the inoculation is receiving financial support for his work from a company involved in its manufacture. Professor Michael Langman, who heads the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, gets funding from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) for his medical research at Birmingham University. [Media Aug 16, 2004] Five-in-one jab adviser has links to vaccine firm

"5 out of 6 members of the (UK) Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had interests with Glaxo Wellcome, 4 with SmithKline Beecham (ref: May 1999 Secretary of State for Health)

The person who commissioned Deer was Paul Nuki, Sunday Times' sometime Head of Newsroom investigations and "Focus" editor. Paul Nuki is son of Professor George Nuki. Professor George Nuki in 1987 sat on the Committee on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was considering Glaxo company Smith Kline & French Laboratories' Pluserix MMR vaccine for safety approval. ......sitting on the CSM with Professor George Nuki was Professor Sir Roy Meadow and Professor Sir David Hull............it was Professor Sir David Hull in 1998 who, as chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, started the attacks on Wakefield's work 
    A
s Chairman of the JCVI, Professor Sir David Hull could have taken action to deal with the issues over the MMR and protect British children
    In 1998 Professor Sir David Hull wrote (on home headed notepaper) to Dean Zuckerman of The Royal Free, suggesting the Royal Free Hospital's work was unethical research without clinical justification (wrongfully, as the public would have learnt if The Observer had been reporting the current GMC hearings into the Wakefield case)
    Despite his attacks on Wakefield's work, two years later in 2000, it was Professor Sir David Hull who rewrote the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health ethical guidelines to permit research on children where there was no clinical benefit (albeit in The Royal Free's case all the investigations were clinically justified)  [April 2008] MMR/AUTISM & THE TAMING OF THE BRITISH MEDIA--Clifford Miller

"Four of the medical experts advising the Government on whether the new meningitis C vaccine is safe have links to one or more of the drug companies that produce it......Professor Janet Darbyshire, a member of the Government's Committee on Safety of Medicines, had received support for academic research from US firms Wyeth and Chiron, who produce the two main meningitis products being used on children in Britain....three members of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had declared interests in vaccine manufacturers...Dr David Goldblatt of the Institute of Child Health, has served on an expert advisory panel for Wyeth and received research grants from Wyeth and North American Vaccines, which produces a third meningitis C drug to be introduced this year. Another, Professor Keith Cartwright of the University of Bristol, received funding from the drug industry to 'evaluate candidate meningicoccal vaccines'. "--Martin Bright and Tracy McVeigh,  Sunday Observer, UK September 3, 2000

"A Parliamentary Written Question by Mrs. Ann Winterton MP in May 1999 confirmed the following declared interests within the JCVI membership (NB - the PWQ related only to a limited range of pharmaceuticals companies, so the full list will be greater than this): Professor Lewis Ritchie (Glaxo Wellcome), Dr. Barbara Bannister (Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham),  Dr. David Goldblatt (SmithKline Beecham), Dr. Diana Walford (Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham), Professor Roy Anderson (Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham), Dr. Karl Nicholson (Glaxo Wellcome)"--David Thrower Flawed UK Regulatory and Monitoring Systems (2001)

 The Chairman reminded  members that the proceedings,  papers, and information before them were confidential and should not be disclosed

Parliamentary Ombudsman Investigations Completed July 2003 - June 2004 Department of Health Refusal to provide information about the awarding of a contract to supply a stock of smallpox vaccine
Ms Branigan originally asked DoH for a number of pieces of information relating to the awarding of a contract to PowderJect Technologies PLC to supply a stock of smallpox vaccine. She then asked 17 Government Departments, including DoH, for information relating to contacts between their respective Ministers and representatives of PowderJect. Finally, she asked DoH for several pieces of information relating to the work of the sub- group of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, which had given advice on the choice of the particular smallpox vaccine strain. DoH declined to release most of the information sought by Ms Branigan and cited a number of code exemptions in justification. After a protracted investigation, beset by DoH delays, the Ombudsman recommended that almost all the information sought by Ms Branigan be released. Following a further exchange of correspondence, DoH agreed to the release of information which had already entered the public domain but either refused to address the remaining recommendations or refused to release the information recommended for disclosure. The Ombudsman criticised the manner in which DoH had handled Ms Branigan's information requests and for their failure to engage effectively with her own investigation.
.......In respect of the letter of 29 May 2002, DoH: have continued to refuse to confirm the identities of the second and third members of the JCVI sub-group even though the identity of the second member is already in the public domain ; have refused to release the names of the organisations to whom the other members of the sub-group belonged, and have apparently refused to release the information contained in the document headed 'Main Points', which summarises that meeting.

External
FOI releases - Recent releases of information arising from Freedom of Information requests