HIV & AIDS Quotes
Quotes

Famous AID$ quotes

http://www.rethinkaids.com/body.cfm?id=114

“[Aids] is not ‘God’s wrath’ or any other absurdity. A segment of our society was experimenting with their lifestyle, and it didn’t work. They got sick. Another segment of our pluralistic society, call them doctor/scientist refugees from the failed War on Cancer, or just call them professional jackals, discovered that it did work. It worked for them. They are still making payments on their . new BMWs out of your pocket.” — Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing the polymerase chain reaction, the basis for the HIV viral load tests. Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. Vintage Books. 2000

No HIV virus has ever been proven to exist.... AIDS is not a new disease, but a collection of old diseases renamed, and that the real threat to the public's health are the worthless HIV tests and toxic HIV/AIDS drugs. [1992 first ed] Vaccines Are Dangerous: A Warning to the Black Community by Curtis Cost

Here is what he meant, and what I confirmed with him point by point: AIDS is a label given to a whole variety of disease conditions THAT ARE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT THINGS. Not HIV. Not HIV in any way, direct or indirect. What is called AIDS is immune suppression. This immune suppression can result from different causes in different groups and, ultimately, in different individuals. Some of the many causes – contaminated heroin, medical drugs (such as corticosteroids), starvation, contaminated water supplies, toxic pesticides, intestinal parasites grossly overtreated with massive doses of antibiotics, syphilis, massive drug taking, say, in the form of MDA – combined with months of bathhouse sex with many partners, vaccines given to people whose immune systems are already dangerously compromised. There are other causes.
    Medavoy's propaganda work was aimed, in particular, at masking the continuing causes of death on the African continent – starvation, contaminated water supplies, theft of agricultural lands, and so on. Gradually, these obvious factors would be replaced in the public consciousness with a new buzz-term, HIV. As the real causes of death were allowed to flourish, depopulation would begin to overtake the population growth.
    Medavoy worked on the entirely bogus green-monkey theory of AIDS.
    "The green monkey," Medavoy told me, "was a myth invented to attribute the origin of HIV to Africa. It was understood that if HIV could be said to have come from Africa, then people would believe the outrageous estimates and projections for future AIDS deaths IN Africa. You know, darkest Africa, where strange and bad things lurk. We played that nonsense like a harp. The green monkey never even carried HIV – of course who cares because HIV causes nothing anyway. But the whole deal about those monkeys was really about lab monkeys in Boston who were found to have a virus 'similar' to HIV – and lab contamination was where that 'similar' virus actually came from. We knew way ahead of time – as we propounded the early green-monkey story – that it was monkeys in labs we were really talking about. We were talking about stupid and careless research in labs, and we were transferring that whole business into a ridiculous myth about Africa. The story was about as real as the moon being made of cheese."
...
"As far as the very embarrassing and growing list of AIDS survivors was concerned – the people who had rejected the idea of HIV and were rebuilding their health successfully without medical drugs – we tried to keep track of pending stories on these people, and we went to those media outlets and told them these people were 'vegetarian kooks' and 'anecdotal examples who had not been studied by real scientists' and 'publicity seekers' and so on. We said some of them had never really been HIV positive to begin with. It was like shooting pigeons. We did pretty well. Some stories did appear on these survivors, but the general tone was, 'so and so is a strange curiosity and scientists are studying why he has managed to live for so long without getting sick, and this may hold promise for future research.' You know, all that crap."
Here is another choice quote from Medavoy on the AIDS scam. He told me this in 1996:
"Some other operatives I was aware of played a role in getting mainstream researchers to lobby for, and win, a new standard for HIV illness, based purely on numbers of T-cells. [Note: this "innovation" came later, long after 1987.] Tests would determine if a person was 'getting sick,' or if he was 'getting better' after taking his AZT – all measured by how many T-cells [part of the immune system defense] showed up on the tests. These operatives knew, and had been briefed on this, that T-cells could actually vary all over the place, up and down, depending on factors like the time of day a person was given the test. It was another area of shoddy science, and they took advantage of it. I'll give you an example. You've got some guy who has been told he's HIV positive, and so, even though he's not sick at all, he gets tested every few months for numbers of T-cells. Sooner or later, those numbers will go down on a test. If the doctor isn't really attentive, he'll tell the patient he is now officially diagnosed with full-blown AIDS, because those numbers are too low. If the patient hasn't been taking AZT yet, he will go for it now."   [2003] Depopulation and HIV by Jon Rappoport

Several well meaning researchers have fostered this point of view (AIDS man made virus)  in their books, tapes, lectures and news media interviews. These individuals include: Dr. Robert Strecker in his video entitled, The Strecker Memorandum, Dr. lack Felder author of the book: AIDS U.S. Germ Warfare, Dr. William Campbell Douglas in his book: AIDS The End of Civilization, Leonard G, Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses and Dr. Alan Cantwell in his book AIDS and the Doctors of Death. Each of these individuals, and others, presented their documentation and they made compelling arguments. I spent a great deal of timecredentials, and the soundness of their arguments, it is easy to see why millions came to share their belief that HIV was a man-made virus, and that it was designed to reduce the world's population, especially among Africans and other people with color.
    Each of these men had one critical flaw in their arguments and that is, none of them addressed the controversy over whether any HIV virus has ever been isolated! This one issue is the foundation which determines whether the biological warfare theory holds up or crumbles to the ground! For years 1 accepted the biological warfare theory, but after researching the debate, I now know that the biological warfare theory does not have a leg to stand on. This does not mean that there are not very evil people out there who aren't capable of creating all types of atrocities in secret laboratories. Evil men and women do exist and such laboratories also exist and they have already created nightmarish chemical and biological entities. On the other hand, there is no evidence that HIV was created by anyone, nor that HIV even exists! [1992 first ed] Vaccines Are Dangerous: A Warning to the Black Community by Curtis Cost

In regard to AIDS Dr Hamer observes that no one ever died of AIDS without having previously been told that they are HIV positive or believe that they are. The implication is that just as with cancer, it is the negative perception associated with AIDS that causes its devastating effect. The New Medicine of Dr Hamer by Walter Last

everyone assumes that AIDS is actually a viral disease, which is a fraudulent statement by those people who presented it, because the human body is the product of many, many years of having fought various viral diseases, and has survived. Smallpox, polio, measles, and all the other viruses that can kill very easily, and the body has an ability to mount a defense system against these hot viruses, viruses that actually very quickly can kill. But having survived those, how is it possible that the slow virus would kill us in the name of AIDS? I can’t understand it.
........the whole entire existence of the pharmaceutical industry is based on presentation of false science, and advertising this false science and drumming it into the minds of gullible people who have no curiosity to find out why that is so. The Water Cure: An interview with Dr. Batmanghelidj

Passing 50 to 100 microamperes of simple D.C. electrical current through Aids infected blood disables the Aids virus and stops reproducing it was discovered in 1992. It also works on a broad range of other viruses/bacteria including Hep-A,B,C and also quite importantly for malaria.see below.  Research conducted at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461 in New York but researchers forced to keep quiet after being threatened by the pharmaceutical companies who would lose many 100 of billions of dollars if the method came into wide spread use. Remember an Aids person is a revenue stream for an average of 5 years of between $5,000 to $20,000 per person per year for the pharmaceutical industry. Blood Electrification Effectiveness On Malaria

Neither of the "HIV-antibody" tests -- the Elisa or the Western Blot -- has ever been properly validated, which means that no one knows what their results mean. The tests are chemical reactions to antigens, which are substances that provoke an immune response. Many dozens of conditions can produce a positive result on these tests, including drug abuse, flu vaccinations, past infection with malaria, pregnancy, and liver disease. Nevertheless, physicians still use these worthless tests, assume that positive results mean HIV infection, and give their patients doom-diagnoses of "HIV-positive" or "AIDS". 'AIDS: A Death Cult' by John Lauritsen

"Another problem of the AIDS epidemiology is the following: By now about 30 afflictions all of which were known before, are being renamed to AIDS in the presence of a positive HIV-test. This also is not an increase of diseases of course --but just a redefinition. This circular definition HIV+/TB = AIDS and HIV-/TB = TB makes the correlation HIV-AIDS appear 100%. For example, a patient who suffers from TB and who is also HIV-positive is an AIDS patient today, and a woman who suffers from cervical carcinoma is an AIDS patient today, and a patient with a lymphoma is today not a lymphoma patient but also an AIDS patient if he has antibodies against HIV. " ---- Claus Köhnlein (BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases?)

"Prior to October of 1997, I believed that HIV was the cause of AIDS based solely on the information that had been reported by the United States Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) and the AIDS establishment. However, my view was unquestionably changed when I evaluated the medical evidence on the worldwide AIDS epidemic. My findings clearly show: 1) The HIV-hypothesis is not supported by any medical fact and AIDS is caused by agents and factors other than HIV. 2) The proponents of the HIV-hypothesis have long overlooked crucial and essential medical evidence that clearly describes the real causes of AIDS. 3) The results of clinical studies on AZT, protease inhibitors, and nevirapine indicate that these agents can cause severe systemic damage, AIDS, and death."----Mohammed A. Al-Bayati

Dr Rebecca Culshaw, assistant professor of mathematics at the University of Texas, a mathematical biologist who for 10 years studied and published models of HIV disease and treatment. In an internet posting entitled "Why I Quit HIV", Culshaw calls for a ban on HIV tests. She says they do "immeasurably more harm than good" because of an "astounding" lack of specificity and standardisation; she adds that many people are being treated with drugs on the basis of an insupportable theory. "My work … has been built in large part on the paradigm that HIV causes Aids and I have since come to realise that there is good evidence that the entire basis for this theory is wrong."  [Media March 2006] Out of Control AIDS and the corruption of medical scienceBy Celia Farber

"Kary Mullis, Nobel laureate in chemistry 1993 and inventor of the polymerase chain reaction, needed a reference for "the generally known fact" that HIV was the cause of AIDS. While working on a project he became aware that he didn´t know a scientific reference for the statement he had just written down: HIV is the probable cause of AIDS. So he asked the next virologist at the table after that basic paper. The virologist told Mullis, he wouldn´t need a reference in this case; after all, everyone knows that HIV leads to AIDS. Kary Mullis disagreed and thought such an important discovery should be published in some paper. He learnt soon that it was impossible to find such a paper. Instead, he was pointed to the press conference of 1983 over and over again.
    One day, he got the opportunity to talk to Luc Montagnier from the Pasteur Institute, the [claimed] discoverer of the virus, during an event in San Diego. HE should know the answer. Confronted with Mullis´question, Montagnier said: "Why don´t you cite the report of the CDC (Centers of Disease Control)?" Mullis answered: "This report doesn´t address the question whether or not HIV is the cause of AIDS" - "Right", Montagnier admitted, "but maybe you could cite the SIV study (Simian Immunedeficiency Virus, which is very similar to HIV)." That paper didn´t convince Mullis either, because the monkeys developed different diseases, also because the virus wasn´t the same one, and thirdly, because the paper had been published only a few months before. He looked for the original paper that should demonstrate in whatever form that HIV was the cause of AIDS. At that point, Montagnier´s answer consisted of running away, to greet a group on the other side of the room.
    I had a similar experience this year [2000] in South Africa on the AIDS Advisory Panel, which had been initiated by president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki had invited 33 scientists from all over the world in order to shed light on the AIDS problem in his country. Among them were 22 scientists who believed in the virus hypothesis, and 11 so-called dissidents (which I belong to), who cast doubt on the virus hypothesis and rather assume that AIDS in Africa is the result of increasing poverty, while AIDS in the developed countries is the result of drugs, and above all the result of the therapy against AIDS (AZT).
    I asked Montagnier what convinced him that AIDS is caused by a virus. Montagnier answered that over the years apparently an effective treatment has been developed, and this was proof enough for HIV leading to AIDS. In other words, the virologists have no virological arguments for the theory that HIV leads to AIDS. Instead, they get the proof for their hypotheses from physicians, who give a positive feedback by saying "Of course AIDS is a viral disease that responds to antiviral treatment." ---- Claus Köhnlein

He (Thabo Mbeki) already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.  Jon Rappoport interview

In that year, I began travelling the world, lecturing and interviewing extensively upon the subject of ozone and oxygen therapies. I called all the major network news bureaus, including Public Radio, and reported ozone AIDS cures coming out of Europe. Not a single reporter or show called back for details. I wrote and sent documentation to all of the "household word" TV talk show hosts who make their living by acting "concerned" and I tried with all the "AIDS fundraising spokespeople", show business celebs, even sending proof of their home addresses, but as of yet not one single phone call or inquiry came back asking for more. The shining media lights are not the big names who plunk down millions or give benefits for "research," but the many brave independent talk show hosts, show producers, and health expo promoters that have let me on to put the information out there for you. We owe them a debt of gratitude. OZONE HAS CURED AIDS IN OVER 300 CASES--Ed McCabe

In 1979, we find one of the first U.S. cases of AIDS successfully being treated by medical ozone therapy. Dr. George Freibott from the International Association of Oxygen Therapy treated a Haitian living in Avon Park Florida who came to him with Kaposi's Sarcome mouth lesions. The Haitian was treated with medical ozone in rectal insufflations, ozone colonies, and direct ozone IV injection on and off for one and a half years, yet only once a week. All his external lesion were eventually healed. No one knew about AIDS back then, but later on Dr. Freibott realised what he had treated.
    ....That same year, George Perez, M.D., Dir. of Virology at Saint Michaels Medical Center, Newark, NJ, a major hospital, was commissioned to undertake a small 30 day ozone/AIDS study. Five AIDS patients underwent only two weeks of ozone treatments at the hospital. All had T-cell counts of below 200. At the start, one was so badly covered with herpes lesions he couldn't wear clothes. By the end of the two weeks his lesions were healed, and all the patients had been released from the hospital. No adverse side effects were reported. The T/4 (immune) cell counts remained stable or increased. Viral protein core (p24) counts decreased, indicating mass virus destruction. Four MD's reviewed the results and stated that ozone therapy is com­pletely non-toxic, and should be adopted. Due to political pressure, the hospital tests were aborted.
    Do you know anyone who got AIDS from a blood transfusion? In 1989, the American Red Cross turned down safe and effective ozone blood purification without allowing any discussion of it at a large meeting in their Washington DC headquarters. If ozone blood purification had been adopted, there would have been no-one from then on with AIDS or Hepatitis contract­ed from a transfusion. Odd that they would even discuss it
    Everybody thinks if you cure AIDS you're instantly rich and famous. Wrong! His reward? An armed S.W.A.T. team invaded his house and office, seized his ozone machine, patient records and computer. This MD subsequently gave up medicine, and now grows tomatoes. Due to ongoing political prob­lems, his former patients and the hospital and the testing labs are also hesitant to come forward due to their fear of political reprisals.
    In 1991, another physician (in New York) came forward to me with his clinical ozone results. He wants no press. One of his staff members who was in the clinic every day and therefore could get the treatments every day was brought from HIV positive to HIV negative. His T-cells went from 700 down to 150 as ozone killed off the diseased cells, and then back up to 1,100 as the body replaced then with fresh new healthy cells. Another M.D., in a southern state who I interviewed stated he and a colleague collectively brought 9 people to HIV NEGATIVE using a combination therapy that included ozone and DMSO. Neither will talk publicly. One had his house burned down and left the country. OZONE HAS CURED AIDS IN OVER 300 CASES--Ed McCabe

If commerce laws were applied equally, the “knowing is beautiful” ads for HIV testing would have to bear a disclaimer, just like cigarettes:  “Warning: This test will not tell you if you’re infected with a virus. It may confirm that you are pregnant or have used drugs or alcohol, or that you’ve been vaccinated; that you have a cold, liver disease, arthritis, or are stressed, poor, hungry or tired. Or that you’re African. It will not tell you if you’re going to live or die; in fact, we really don’t know what testing positive, or negative, means at all.”----- The Hidden Face of HIV – Part 1 By Liam Scheff

In Sub-Saharan African about 60 percent of the population lives and dies without safe drinking water, adequate food or basic sanitation. .....The report describes “heaps of unclaimed garbage” among the crowded houses in the flood zones and “countless pools of water [that] provide a breeding ground for mosquitoes and create a dirty environment that favors cholera.”
    “[L]atrines are built above water streams. During rains the area residents usually open a hole to release feces from the latrines. The rain then washes away the feces to streams, from where the [area residents] fetch water. However, not many people have access to toilet facilities. Some defecate in polythene bags, which they throw into the stream.” They call these, “flying toilets.’’
    The state-run Ugandan National Water and Sewerage Corporation states that currently 55% of Kampala is provided with treated water, and only 8% with sewage reclamation.
    Most rural villages are without any sanitary water source. People wash clothes, bathe and dump untreated waste up and downstream from where water is drawn. Watering holes are shared with animal populations, which drink, bathe, urinate and defecate at the water source. Unmanaged human waste pollutes water with infectious and often deadly bacteria. Stagnant water breeds mosquitoes, which bring malaria. Infectious diarrhea, dysentery, cholera, TB, malaria and famine are the top killers in Africa. But in 1985, they became AIDS.
    The public service announcements that run on VH1 and MTV, informing us of the millions of infected, always fail to mention this. I don’t know what we’re supposed to do with the information that 40 million people are dying and nothing can be done. I wonder why we wouldn’t be interested in building wells and providing clean water and sewage systems for Africans. Given our great concern, it would seem foolish not to immediately begin the “clean water for Africa” campaign. But I’ve never heard such a thing mentioned.
    The UN recommendations for Africa actually demand the opposite –“billions of dollars” taken out of “social funds, education and health projects, infrastructure [and] rural development” and “redirected” into sex education (UNAIDS, 1999). No clean water, but plenty of condoms. ----The Hidden Face of HIV – Part 1 By Liam Scheff

"That's a quote, "pathogenic mycoplasma." And if you know anything about mycoplasmas, myco indicates fungal, but yet mycoplasma is not really a fungus, it's not really a bacteria, it's not really a virus. It's sort of like a pseudo all of them. It has no cell wall, it goes deep into the cell nuclei thereby making it very difficult to mount an immune response against.
    It's man-made. It can be used as a biological weapon. It was developed as an AIDS vaccine-related organism. It was extracted from AIDS patients. It is responsible for virtually all of the symptoms which AIDS patients suffer from. The AIDS virus is at best a co-factor, and not even such a strong co-factor as to bring on all of the symptoms of AIDS.
    ...There's only speculation and the most likely thesis that I'm looking at is through contaminated vaccines, contaminated blood supplies. I don't know any other suitable mode of transmitting that kind of infectious agent. The Nazi Flu Interview With Dr. Leonard Horowitz

"AZT is toxic, it kills...... It kills the immune system, it kills healthy tissue.....I regard HIV as the greatest hoax and fraud in all of medical history, and I would say AZT would be up there."-- John Lauritsen interview by  Gary Null

My book, "AIDS: What the Government Isn't Telling You," written in 1991, details what happened to me when I began to expose the AIDS cover-up. Brick-bats came from every direction! My book may read like a novel but it is totally factual. Every claim I made in the book is fully documented and it is still as true and up-to-date as the day I wrote it - with three exceptions. When I wrote the book, I did not know the following: 1) that AIDS is a man-made virus (I now have the government documentation confirming that this is true), 2) that AIDS is, indeed, curable! (See my video "Diseases Don't Just Happen"), and 3) that AZT, one of the most dangerous drugs on the market, will destroy even more the already suppressed immune system of an AIDS patient. Dr. Day Responds to her Critics

Passing 50 to 100 microamperes of simple D.C. electrical current through Aids infected blood disables the Aids virus and stops reproducing it was discovered in 1992. It also works on a broad range of other viruses/bacteria including Hep-A,B,C and also quite importantly for malaria.see below.  Research conducted at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461 in New York but researchers forced to keep quiet after being threatened by the pharmaceutical companies who would lose many 100 of billions of dollars if the method came into wide spread use. Remember an Aids person is a revenue stream for an average of 5 years of between $5,000 to $20,000 per person per year for the pharmaceutical industry. Blood Electrification Effectiveness On Malaria

World War II, produced of course by Rome, caused the Nazi experiments on the people in the concentration camps-the Jews, the Gypsies, the Socialists, primarily the Jews. But they experimented with things like fluoride. They experimented with things like EDTA chelation, which is THE treatment of choice for anybody with heart disease. They experimented with poisons. They experimented with surgeries. They experimented with all kinds of things on these people. They also experimented with vaccinations and immunizations.
   
There's a book called The Nazi Doctors. Everything that was learned by them was integrated into the American Medical Association, after the war. That's why we all have our municipal water supplies fluoridated. That's why they're all chlorinated, because chlorine decreases oxygen, and therefore causes cancer, because cancer grows in an anaerobic state-it's a virus, converting cells into mutants that are anaerobic.
   
Ok. All of Europe is using ozone to clean their water supplies. Here they use chlorine. They want us with cancer. And how do we get cancer? With the vaccinations and immunizations, where they inject us with live viruses, like the hepatitis vaccine-every one of them has the HIV virus, SV-40.
   
What they're doing is what they learned in Nazi Germany. They implemented here and they continue their research in the CIA. There's a two-tape set called The CIA And The Virus Makers which show how the CIA helped to create the HIV virus and various other viruses. They get into Robert Gallo, the world's foremost virologist.
    Robert Gallo is a Jesuit. He's a Roman Catholic, Italian, the world's foremost virologist-and yet not controlled by the Brotherhood, by the Company? Ridiculous. He's under their control! He's doing all the research, and he doesn't want to be blamed for it-as the WONDERFUL Jew, Len Horowitz, proved. Again, we've got Jews getting in the way-Jews blowing their cover.
    Personally, I have my own home where I use ozone oxygen. I use ultraviolet blood irradiation. I can show you how ultraviolet blood irradiation incapacitates Lupus. It destroys Hepatitis. It destroys Meningitis. It destroys HIV.
   
This is a very simple procedure; I do it every day. It can easily be done by any medical doctor, and they won't do it. Because, when you kill off the virus, you don't have the diseases. You are thwarting what they wanted to do with their vaccinations and immunizations.
    That's why they want to make a law. That's why that filthy Ted Kennedy, that Knight of Columbus, wants all these vaccinations and immunizations-when it should be a religious tenet of everyone: 'It's against my religious convictions to put foreign pathogens into my bloodstream. It's going to make me sick by the time I'm 40. It's going to give me plaque build-up and heart-disease. I'm not going to do it.'
    In the meantime, they're suppressing all the things that reverse it: soft lasers, hyperbaric chambers, ultraviolet blood irradiation, oxygen ozone, north-pole magnetic therapy. All the things working together that would easily reverse it, they suppress, and consider it a crime. Make sense?
The Black Pope: Interview of Eric Jon Phelps

Last year at a meeting of the elite, George Hunt obtained a handout which shows that the elite are committed to stopping the population growth by any means available. Years earlier, Illuminatus Dr. Aurelio Peccei advocated a plague similar to the Black Plague, and when the idea was developed it became the AIDs epidemic. The Illuminati have the cure for AIDS. Bloodlines of the Illuminati Van Duyn

"Kary Mullis, Nobel laureate in chemistry 1993 and inventor of the polymerase chain reaction, needed a reference for "the generally known fact" that HIV was the cause of AIDS. While working on a project he became aware that he didn´t know a scientific reference for the statement he had just written down: HIV is the probable cause of AIDS. So he asked the next virologist at the table after that basic paper. The virologist told Mullis, he wouldn´t need a reference in this case; after all, everyone knows that HIV leads to AIDS. Kary Mullis disagreed and thought such an important discovery should be published in some paper. He learnt soon that it was impossible to find such a paper. Instead, he was pointed to the press conference of 1983 over and over again.
    One day, he got the opportunity to talk to Luc Montagnier from the Pasteur Institute, the [claimed] discoverer of the virus, during an event in San Diego. HE should know the answer. Confronted with Mullis´question, Montagnier said: "Why don´t you cite the report of the CDC (Centers of Disease Control)?" Mullis answered: "This report doesn´t address the question whether or not HIV is the cause of AIDS" - "Right", Montagnier admitted, "but maybe you could cite the SIV study (Simian Immunedeficiency Virus, which is very similar to HIV)." That paper didn´t convince Mullis either, because the monkeys developed different diseases, also because the virus wasn´t the same one, and thirdly, because the paper had been published only a few months before. He looked for the original paper that should demonstrate in whatever form that HIV was the cause of AIDS. At that point, Montagnier´s answer consisted of running away, to greet a group on the other side of the room.
    I had a similar experience this year [2000] in South Africa on the AIDS Advisory Panel, which had been initiated by president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki had invited 33 scientists from all over the world in order to shed light on the AIDS problem in his country. Among them were 22 scientists who believed in the virus hypothesis, and 11 so-called dissidents (which I belong to), who cast doubt on the virus hypothesis and rather assume that AIDS in Africa is the result of increasing poverty, while AIDS in the developed countries is the result of drugs, and above all the result of the therapy against AIDS (AZT).
    I asked Montagnier what convinced him that AIDS is caused by a virus. Montagnier answered that over the years apparently an effective treatment has been developed, and this was proof enough for HIV leading to AIDS. In other words, the virologists have no virological arguments for the theory that HIV leads to AIDS. Instead, they get the proof for their hypotheses from physicians, who give a positive feedback by saying "Of course AIDS is a viral disease that responds to antiviral treatment." ---- Claus Köhnlein

"Another problem of the AIDS epidemiology is the following: By now about 30 afflictions all of which were known before, are being renamed to AIDS in the presence of a positive HIV-test. This also is not an increase of diseases of course --but just a redefinition. This circular definition HIV+/TB = AIDS and HIV-/TB = TB makes the correlation HIV-AIDS appear 100%. For example, a patient who suffers from TB and who is also HIV-positive is an AIDS patient today, and a woman who suffers from cervical carcinoma is an AIDS patient today, and a patient with a lymphoma is today not a lymphoma patient but also an AIDS patient if he has antibodies against HIV. " ---- Claus Köhnlein (BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases?)

"HIV has been found to be totally absent in the system of over 4,600 persons diagnosed with AIDS, so to save political face the US Centers for Disease Control have been forced of late to give such cases a new name i.e., "idiopathic CD 4 Iymphocytopenia."---Raymond Obomsawin (quoting Duesberg)

"Prior to October of 1997, I believed that HIV was the cause of AIDS based solely on the information that had been reported by the United States Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) and the AIDS establishment. However, my view was unquestionably changed when I evaluated the medical evidence on the worldwide AIDS epidemic. My findings clearly show: 1) The HIV-hypothesis is not supported by any medical fact and AIDS is caused by agents and factors other than HIV. 2) The proponents of the HIV-hypothesis have long overlooked crucial and essential medical evidence that clearly describes the real causes of AIDS. 3) The results of clinical studies on AZT, protease inhibitors, and nevirapine indicate that these agents can cause severe systemic damage, AIDS, and death."----Mohammed A. Al-Bayati

None of the African AIDS diseases is new. Many common Third World diseases are confused with AIDS even if they are not part of its official definition. The WHO definition for African AIDS includes "slim disease," a composite of weight loss, diarrhoea, and fever, plus such conditions as persistent coughing, skin problems, swollen lymph nodes and some opportunistic infections like tuberculosis. This list reads like a summary of indigenous African health problems. ----from "Inventing the AIDS Virus" by Prof. Duesberg

"You've got a hundred thousand people getting money this year -- five billion dollars -- to study an HIV virus. And we know more about this virus than any substance in human history, and yet they cannot help a single person with AIDS…………Every single person in there (AIDS video) had a positive statement to say, and instead of all those people being DEAD, they were all alive and well and several were sero-converted from HIV positive to HIV negative. Now there is not a SINGLE PERSON that they can bring forward who has been on THEIR therapies, and I can bring home twelve hundred people who are alive and well."---Gary Null

"To cure AIDS, its a total life style change --- not a drug or a pill. Natural healing can cure AIDS. But if you are looking for one special anti-viral herb to solve this disease, you’re as nuts as the doctors. How stupid can these experts be (and the patients, too), to believe that a single drug, a chemical on its lonesome, can cure a total body breakdown? We don't need any more research money to cure AIDS. The answers exists already thanks to the work of Dr. Richard Schulze, who was not afraid to work with dying patients."---Sam Biser http://www.newhealth.net/schulze/

"I have a large population of people who have chosen not to take any antiretrovirals since I've been following them--since the very beginning... They've watched all of their friends go on the antiviral bandwagon and die, so they've chose to remain naive [to therapy]". ----Donald I. Abrams, Prof. of Clinical Medicine at UCSF

"Documents at the NCI in 1991 revealed that Maitake mushrooms were as effective as the toxic killer  drug AZT. Incredibly the NCI converted the natural Maitaki extract into a sulphate and thus rendered it toxic. ...AZT continues to make billions for Wellcome, while committing mass murder...GOD offered the FDA an incentive in the form of a good job in heaven, but withdrew the offer when he realised they were all destined to go to Hell!."--Robert Willner, M.D.

"AIDS (is) not infectious--but caused by recreational and anti-HIV drugs."---Peter H. Duesberg, Ph.D. is a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. http://WWW.DUESBERG.COM/

"The most toxic drug that has ever been licensed for long term consumption in the free world. ... AZT is a prescription drug and according to the manufacturer itself it causes symptoms that are indistinguishable from AIDS. So I would say it is not arrogant for me to say that AZT is AIDS by prescription."- Dr Peter Duesberg

"In 1993 about 200,000 HIV positive individuals received AZT……the consumption of AZT by HIV positive individuals will, over time, destroy their immune systems and produce AIDS. This is even acknowledged by Wellcome…..(it) will definitely fulfill the prophesy of the HIV/AIDS hypothesis: HIV positive individuals who get AZT will get AIDS."—Peter Deusberg & John Yiamouyiannis, Ph.D.

The label on an AZT bottle from the Sigma Co. The AZT advisory on the label reads: "TOXIC. Toxic by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s): Blood bone marrow. If you feel unwell, seek medical advice (show the label where possible). Wear suitable protective clothing." Note the skull and bones on the label; the indication for a deathly poison (bottle contains only 100 mg, people with HIV are prescribed 500 to 1500 mg a day).

"Recent studies have indicated that those who take AZT die up to a year faster than those who do not take it, and Hedlund (AZT litigation lawyers) claim: "I think that the overwhelming information is that AZT is deadly and it just hurts people."—Celia Farber

MYTH: HIV=AIDS=DEATH FACT: HIV does not invariably lead to AIDS and death. The HIV hypthesis was adopted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as merely a surveillance tool. As of yet, HIV still remains to be proven as a cause of any disease. HIV has not been proven to play a role in immune suppression.

MYTH: HIV causes AIDS FACT: HIV has never been scientifically proven to be the cause of AIDS. Data from the initial test group study of individuals who tested for HIV back in 1985 shows that only 40-50% of persons diagnosed with AIDS actually tested positive for HIV antibodies. The other 50-60% tested negative even though they were given an AIDS diagnosis by their doctors.

"MYTH: AZT kills HIV and extends life expectancy FACT: AZT kills fast growing cells irregardless of whether they are infected with HIV. AZT attacks the immune system and causes the same symptoms attributed to AIDS progression. (this applies to all the "anti-virals": DDI, D4T, 3TC and DDC). AZT is highly toxic and it kills cells randomly! The toxic effects of AZT include anemia, muscle atrophy, nausea, lymphoma and bone marrow cancer."—HEAL SF http://www.healsf.org/related_sites.htm

"The list of celebrity AIDS patients who died on AZT for their belief in medical authority includes ballet star Rudolf Nureyev, who died in 1993, Randy Shilts, the author of the bestseller And the Band Played On, who died in 1994 and many more. As a thoroughly politicized epidemic, AIDS began with a falsehood and ended in tragedy. Virus hunters in the CDC­directed public health movement first made the new syndrome appear contagious. Virus hunters in the NIH­funded research establishment then blamed AIDS on a retrovirus. And virus hunters in the NIH, CDC, FDA, and pharmaceutical industry exploited the situation by resurrecting failed cancer chemotherapeutic drugs for AIDS treatment. In the crisis atmosphere created by the CDC, which allowed no time to think before acting, such toxic drugs as AZT, ddI, and ddC could bypass the normal review procedures and achieve a sanctified monopoly status. The final results have been an unnecessary death toll and an artificially expanding AIDS epidemic."—Peter Deusberg

"At present, evidence exists showing that AZT causes "a significant increased risk of death among the patients treated early", that is, in patients who commence treatment when asymptomatic. In other words, instead of curing patients or prolonging life AZT shortens it. Furthermore, since some of the clinical and laboratory manifestations of AZT toxicity mimic AIDS, it is impossible to differentiate between AZT toxicity and AIDS. *---By Eleni Papadopulos et al.

 

Name: Buddy Johnson Email: cajunmen@aol.com   Location: New Iberia, La. USA  Date: Sunday, 18 January 1998

Story: I was given AZT upon testing positive for HIV. At the time, I was working and feeling well and healthy. My t-cell count was 224. After two years of vomiting every morning before work, and severe headaches, I was forced to quit working. My mental faculties were waning, loss of memory mainly as AZT crosses the brain barrier. After quitting work, I developed severe myopathy in my legs. I could scarcely walk as my legs grew thinner and the muscles hurt from soreness as they had grown too small to support me. Finally, I flushed my AZT down the toilet. I began a regimen of vitamins, healthy diet, and started lifting weights. My health returned quickly. My t-4 count continued sliding downward, but I felt much better. I did no prescription drugs for two years, then began a cocktail of zerit/epivir/crixivan. It worked. My t-4's increased from 21 to 282 in a year. Undetectable viral load over that time also.

I work as a volunteer in an HIV clinic in Louisiana. It tears me up to see 90% of the patients being prescribed AZT or its evil twin Combovir. They are being served up death and willingly swallow it out of ignorance. Even pregnant mothers and babies. When will this nightmare end?

"AZT is toxic, it kills, and we are not being told that. It kills the immune system, it kills healthy tissue. It certainly will kill them (medical treatment), and more and more when you read obituaries. There are people who would have been an aids case several years ago, but now they don’t mention aids, they will say things like liver failure, which is almost a key word for AZT poisoning. Recently in Minneapolis the first gay politician, Brian Coyle died. He died of liver failure, and he had been on AZT therapy. He never developed aids, AZT killed him before he had a chance to, and interestingly another thing too is the diagnosis of being HIV positive which to me would mean nothing at all, but psychologically it is very dangerous. One person after another theirn health starts to fall apart as soon as they hear they are positive, although in some cases they may have been positive for years before they received this deadly diagnosis……..if you or I were to take AZT we would be lucky to make 3 or 5 years, and I am in excellent health. I took, at least, the 3 most important studies to show AZT efficacy, and I showed not only were they very sloppy and bad but it would be completely fair to describe at least two of them as fraudulent and I have held out a challenge to people who advocate AZT, I say show me one study, just one single study, that clearly show benefits for AZT, research that will stand up under scrutiny. Nobody will do this. A few cases they have mentioned studies that are just simply ridiculous like one done by Pitzo where he poisoned a few children with AZT and then he claimed it boosted their IQ. About a quarter of the children died rather shortly, but he was so excited by the fact that he thought their IQ’s went up that he advocated giving AZT to newborn babies. This is truly sick research, but I have found from my studies that not only are their no proven benefits to AZT therapy, but that it is deadly, and in fact right on the label of AZT they list such things as hemotoxicity …what that means in plain English is that AZT poisons the blood, and then it will say severe anaemia, and that means that it will be so toxic to the blood that there will be a very serious shortage of red blood cells. Now who on earth would want to take such a product, especially as the benefits are based on research that is based on sloppyness and cheating."---John Lauritsen, Poison by Prescription

 "WARNlNG: Retrovir (AZT) may be associated with hematologic toxicity (blood poisoning) including granulocytopenia and severe anemia particularly in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease... Prolonged use of Retrovir has been associated with symptomatic myopathy similar to that produced by human Immunodeficiency virus...The full safety and efficacy profile of Retrovir has not been defined, particularly in regard to prolonged use in HIV-Infected individuals who have less advanced disease:'------Glaxo-Wellcome, manufacturer of AZT

"The one thing I will go to my grave not understanding is why everyone was so quick to accept everything the government said as truth. Especially the central myth: The cause of AIDS is known. People cling to any certainty they can find, even if it's false."

Michael Callen, author, AIDS activist (deceased)

"AIDS does not inevitably lead to death...It is very important to tell this to people. Psychological factors are critical in supporting immune function. If you suppress this psychological support by telling someone he is condemned to die, your words alone will have condemned him:'----------Dr. Luc Montagniet, discoverer of HIV

"Dr. Joseph Sonnabend, a pioneering AIDS researcher and founder of the AIDS Medical Foundation, which became the American Foundation for AIDS Research (AmFAR), walked out on the organization he had started primarily because he refused to participate in what he saw as a terror campaign: 'The AIDS Medical Foundation was sending out this press release saying nobody is safe, everyone's going to get it. It was all just nonsense. I called them up and said, do you know what Is going to happen as a result of what you are doing? You're going to freak out heterosexual men, you are going to destroy relationships and marriages. You are going to promote violence against gay men.' People are going to say this is a plague and it's coming from gay men and they are going to beat them up at random: All of which has come true."--------Celia Farber, SPIN Magazine

"The story of AIDS is deeply connected with the vicissitudes of the theory that viruses cause cancer and the failure of the cancer research programme. Michael Verney-Elliot put it most acidly when he said: 'From the people who didn't bring you the virus that causes cancer, It's the virus that doesn’t cause AIDS."'------Jad Adams, The HIV Myth

"Nobody wants to look at the facts about this...it's the most extraordinary thing I've ever seen. I've sent countless letters to medical journals pointing out the epidemiological discrepancies and they simply ignore them. The fact is, this whole heterosexuaI AIDS thing is a hoax."-------Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Public Health Professor University of Glasgow

"A powerful hypothesis has to explain and predict. I ask you, what kind of scientist continues to support a hypothesis that fails to explain and predict We've been willing to turn immunology upside down, turn our understanding of biology and disease agents upside-down and inside-out. The virus theory has produced nothing."

"I am not an agnostic. I am well convinced that HIV is harmless."----Dr. Fablo Franchi, Infectious disease specialist

Poppers are a dangerous drug known to cause immune deficiency, anemia strokes and lung damage, and are suspected of causing cancer."------John Lauritsen, research analyst, author, the AIDS War

"Sometimes we virologists have a virus in search of a disease."----Dr. Robert Gallo, HIV "co-discoverer"

"'It's not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no such documents?'-------Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate

"If you think a virus Is the cause of AIDS, do a control without it. To do a control is the first thing you teach undergraduates. But it hasn't been done. The epidemiology of AIDS Is a pile of anecdotal stories selected to fit the virus-AIDS hypothesis. People don't bother to check the details of popular dogma or consensus views."---Dr. Peter Duesberg, Member, National Academy of ScIences

"HlV infection per se seems to entail little danger unless it is addressed with anti-viral therapy?'----Tim Hand, PhD, Professor of Behavioral Pharmacology

"The fact Is, am now convinced, AIDS Is not a disease at all-it is a government program."-----Tom Bethell, Hoover Institute researcher

"Considering that there is little scientific proof of the exact linkage of HIV and AIDS is It ethical to prescribe AZT, a toxic chain terminator of DNA developed 30 years ago as cancer chemotherapy, to 150,000 Americans-among them pregnant women and newborn babies-as an anti-HIV drug?"----Rep. 'GIl Gutknecht, US House Of Representatives

"The orthodoxy will collapse because it flunks the practical tests. The AIDS epidemic was a mirage."---Professor Hiram Caton, ethicist

HIV: Anyone Really Positive?

"People who receive gamma globulin shots for chickenpox, measles and hepatitis could test positive for HIV even If they've never been infected. The Food and Drug Administration says that a positive test could be caused by antibodies found In most of Americas supply of gamma globulin.

Gam ma globulin is made from blood collected from thousands of donors and is routinely given to millions of people each year as temporary protection against many infectious diseases.

Dr. Thomas Zuck of the FDA's Blood and Blood Products Division says the government didn't release the Information because 'we thought it would do more harm than good"-----USA Today, October 2, 1987

"The techniques of the HIV test have not been standardized, and the magnitude and the consequences of Inter-laboratory variations have not been measured. Its results require interpretation, and the criteria for this interpretation vary not only from lab to lab, but also from month to month."----New England Journal of MedicIne, 317:238-241

"The test for the existence of antibodies against AIDS-associated virus is not diagnostic for AIDS and AIDS-like diseases. Negative tests do not exclude the possibility of contact or infection with the AIDS-associated virus. Positive tests do not prove AIDS or pre-AIDS disease status nor that these diseases will be acquired." Manufacturer's statement In leaflet accompanying Western Blot (HIV) test kit

· "The only way to distinguish between real reactions and cross-reactions Is to use HIV isolation. All claims of HIV isolation are based on a set of phenomena detected in tissue culture, none of which are isolation and none of which are even specfity of the HIV antibody tests for HIV infection."----Bio/Technology Journal, 11:696-707

'Electron microscopy reveals retrovirus-like particles in 90% of enlarged lymph n odes from AIDS patients, but the identical particles can be found in 9O% of enlarged lymph nodes from patients who do not have AIDS and are not at r!sk for developing AIDS. If the particles seen in lymph nodes from A!DS patients are, as the AIDS experts assure us, HIV, what are the particles seen in patients who are not at risk for AIDS?"

Dr. Valendar Turner, Australian Broadcasting Commission program, 1994

 

"With public health officials and politicians thrashing out who should be tested for HIV, the accuracy of the test Itself has been nearly Ignored. A study last month by Congress's Office of Technology Assessment found that HIV tests can be very inaccurate indeed. For groups at very low risk-people who don't use IV drugs or have sex with gay or bi-sexual men-9 In 10 positive findings are called false positives, Indicating Infection where none exists."-----US News & World Report, November23, 1987

 

"HIV tests are notoriously unreliable in Africa. A 1994 study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases concluded that HIV tests were useless in central Africa, where the microbes responsible for tuberculosis, malaria and leprosy were so prevalent that they registered over 70% false positive."----Sacramento Bee, October 30,1994

"In the September 4 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, the CDC announced that a diagnosis of AIDS no longer requires an HIV test. The government now considers you an AIDS carrier If you suffer from any of the maladies on its new list of diseases indicative of AIDS, including such relatively common infections as herpes simplex, tuberculosis, Salmonellosis and a shockingly broad 'other bacterial infections. This broad definition will lead to countless new AIDS diagnoses-whether C not the person actually has AIDS.

A major problem with the new AIDS definition is that It ignores the man environmental causes of immune suppression. Exposure to toxins, alcoholism, heavy drug use or heavy antibiotic use all can cause onset the list of "diseases" indicative of AIDS.

The CDC itself conceded In a stunning remark near the end of the JAMA article that the new AIDS ground rules are highly suspect. 'The diagnostic criteria accepted by the AIDS surveillance case definition should not be interpreted as the standard of good medical practice; warned the CDC."-----Los Angeles Weekly, December 18, 1987

 

"The PCR detects at best single genes and most often, only bits of genes. Your PCR finds two or three genetic fragments out of a possible dozen co plete genes, this is not proof that you have all the genes (the whole genome).

 

HIV experts admit that the majority of HIV genomes studied are incomplete; they are defective and could never orchestrate the synthesis of a viral particle. And even if all genomes were complete, basic virology teaches that you can carry a whole retroviral genome around inside your cells all your life without ever making a viral particle.

In 1992, in the only study of its type, French researchers found that the agreement between the PCR and the antibody tests varied between 40-100%'-----Dr. Eleni Eleopulos, Royal Perth Hospital, Australia

"Cross-reactions with non-HIV antibodies have been documented In the presence of the following: any other retroviruses besides HIV, the flu vlrus, common cold virus, herpes simplex 2 virus, hepatitis B virus, all Myco bacterium bacterial species (Including tuberculosis, leprosy, and M. avium "MAC"), vaccinations such as for flu or hepatitis B, pregnancy or prior pregnancy, blood transfusions, hemophilia, blood clotting factor, sperm, a highly oxidized physiological condition (associated with extensive use a drugs or blood products), autoimmune disorders such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis; cancers such as multiple myeloma; alcohol hepatitis, alcoholism, liver disease, naturally occuring antibodies such as antibodies to carbohydrate, nuclear antigens, human T-cells, mitochondria, and cellular actin; tape worms and other parasites; malaria, malnutrition, and other conditions...in the general population, which the CDC estimates to have a prevalence of HIV infection of 0.006%, using a test with a specificity of 99.9%, the result is that 94% of all positives will be false positives."

Christine Johnson, Continuum Magazine, April/May 1995